[slurm-dev] Re: Failed to contact primary controller : No route to host

2013-11-06 Thread Christopher Samuel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/11/13 16:08, Arjun J Rao wrote: Yes, it was the firewall rules on my Scientific Linux installation. Flushed the iptables using iptables -F and now the slurm daemons talk with the slurm controller just fine. Wonderful! Well done. All the

[slurm-dev] Re: Failed to contact primary controller : No route to host

2013-11-05 Thread Christopher Samuel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/11/13 18:52, Arjun J Rao wrote: Now I have tried netstat -lnt on qdr1(130.1.2.205) and it shows this : Proto Recv-QSend-Q LocalAddress ForeignAddress State tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:6817 http://0.0.0.0:6817

[slurm-dev] Re: Failed to contact primary controller : No route to host

2013-11-05 Thread Arjun J Rao
Yes, it was the firewall rules on my Scientific Linux installation. Flushed the iptables using iptables -F and now the slurm daemons talk with the slurm controller just fine. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Christopher Samuel sam...@unimelb.edu.auwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-