, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Loris Bennett <loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de>
wrote:
>
> Hi Sourabh,
>
> sourabh shinde <sourabhshinde2...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Re: [slurm-dev] Re: Multifactor Priority Plugin for Small clusters
> >
> > Thank you guys for your reply.
&g
Hi Sourabh,
sourabh shinde <sourabhshinde2...@gmail.com> writes:
> Re: [slurm-dev] Re: Multifactor Priority Plugin for Small clusters
>
> Thank you guys for your reply.
>
> @Loris : Yes, i had a look at Gang Scheduling which does not fits my
> requirements.
Thank you guys for your reply.
@Loris : Yes, i had a look at Gang Scheduling which does not fits my
requirements.
In my case, a job which is scheduled should complete its execution and then
the next job should start. this is what i need.
@Chris : I had already set up accounting. but the resource
On 07/03/2017 08:11 AM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
On 03/07/17 16:02, Loris Bennett wrote:
I don't think you can achieve what you want with Fairshare and
Multifactor Priority. Fairshare looks at distributing resources fairly
between users over a *period* of time. At any *point* in time it
On 03/07/17 16:02, Loris Bennett wrote:
> I don't think you can achieve what you want with Fairshare and
> Multifactor Priority. Fairshare looks at distributing resources fairly
> between users over a *period* of time. At any *point* in time it is
> perfectly possible for all the resources to
Hi Sourabh,
sourabh shinde writes:
> Multifactor Priority Plugin for Small clusters
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am new to SLURM and trying to run it locally on my PC. I am using
> Multifactor plugin to assign priorities for the job. The problem is
> multi factor