Hi Daniel,
Daniel Ruiz Molina writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm adding user to accounts in accounting information. However, some users in
> my
> system have capital letters and when I try to add them to their account,
> sacctmgr returns this message: "There is no uid for user 'MY_USER' Are you
> sure
> y
I think you need to set AccountingStorageEnforce to 'limits' or order to get
slurm to enforce this.
From: "Hanby, Mike"
Reply-To: slurm-dev
Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 3:01 PM
To: slurm-dev
Subject: [slurm-dev] sacctmgr user maxjobs not working
Howdy,
I'm trying to temporarily disab
that there might be someone who
> at least understands how this part works well enough to know how to undo this
> mistake. Thanks either way!
>
>
> From: Ryan Novosielski
> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:44 AM
> To: slurm-dev
> Subj
On 10/08/16 10:32, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Is it really possible that no one has an answer to this?
Never had to do it I'm afraid!
Have you tried filing a bug on the SchedMD bugzilla?
cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator
VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences C
r way!
From: Ryan Novosielski
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:44 AM
To: slurm-dev
Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: sacctmgr modify cluster controlhost?
Hi all,
I'd written about this some time ago -- I need to change the ControlHost for my
cluster (it somehow got set to a machine that do
Hi all,
I'd written about this some time ago -- I need to change the ControlHost for my
cluster (it somehow got set to a machine that does not run slurmctld). There
was one answer about a patch related to listening on all interfaces on a host,
but my problem is that the ControlHost is flat out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks. Not entirely sure that's relevant to my issue -- the incorrect
ControlHost address is an administrative machine that was, to my
knowledge, never running slurmctld. Unless I'm just not understanding
the relationship.
On 05/10/2016 12:22 PM, Li
You might consider this fix:
https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/79c9a49913625a0f790f29897f0f099156f94268
It was committed to the slurm-15.08 branch yesterday.
Don Lipari
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Novosielski [mailto:novos...@rutgers.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 8:36 A
We've seen the same types of issues.Permission denied when trying to view the
assocaition tree but not for viewing users.Kelly On 10/01/15, Christopher B
Coffey wrote: Hello,The sacctmgr permissions seem to have
changed in 15.08.1. When normal unprivileged users run sacctmgr, they see
permissi
Hi,
the MaxProcSecondsPerJob is obsolete and the documentation is wrong
we have corrected it thanks for finding this.
Note that FairShare parameter is for associations and not for QOS.
->sacctmgr modify account name=zebra set fairshare=99
Modified account associations...
C = linux1403
Yes, you are correct. Our slurmdb wasn’t able to contact the slurmctld at port
6817. Fixing the firewall solved this issue.
Thanks Moe.
Kiran
On Jul 29, 2014, at 21:44, je...@schedmd.com wrote:
>
> Neither restart nor reconfigure should not be required. Check logs, firewall,
> etc.
>
> Quot
Neither restart nor reconfigure should not be required. Check logs,
firewall, etc.
Quoting Kiran Thyagaraja :
Hi,
I was wondering if the following behavior is normal. When we
add/modify accounts/users using sacctmgr, the changes are not seen
by the slurmctld. Only a complete restart (s
Thanks for the fast reply. Yes, I have
AccountingStorageType=accounting_storage/slurmdbd
configured and the AccountingStorageHost is set
to the short hostname. The slurmdbd is not running since it already
receives the error
[2013-06-18T16:37:14-07:00] fatal: The database must be up when starting
On 06/18/2013 05:53 PM, Eva Hocks wrote:
> any sacct command returns:
>
> slurmctld.log:[2013-06-18T14:45:57-07:00] error: Association database
> appears down, reading from state file.
In slurm.conf, are you using
"AccountingStorageType=accounting_storage/slurmdbd" ?
If so, check that slurmdbd
Your understanding is correct. When the user is added later to ldap things
should sync up.
Loris Bennett wrote:
The slurm-...@lists.llnl.gov list will soon be retired. The schedmd.com domain
will host its replacement.
http://www.schedmd.com/slurmdocs/mail.html
The new list is now operational
15 matches
Mail list logo