blank
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:15:10 AM Dennis Zheleznyak wrote:
Hi Chris,
Hiya,
Those all look fine, but I've just noticed you're building RPMs there and
that's something we don't do with Slurm so I'm afraid I'm not sure I can help
there, sorry! :-(
All the best,
Chris
--
Christopher Samuel
Hi all,
First of all, this is my very first message to the list and don't even know
if this is the proper place to port this message.
I am facing a simple project that should allow a slurm user to monitor his
jobs running on a slurm server. I have been looking at the Slurm
authentication API but
Hello Jose,
It is never a good idea to have the public facing credentials be the same as
the private credentials. That is if your public facing server is compromised
your internal system is compromised. The limited cases where direct internal
access are needed (e.g. SSH) should be handled by
Thank you for trying :)
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Chris Samuel sam...@unimelb.edu.au wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:15:10 AM Dennis Zheleznyak wrote:
Hi Chris,
Hiya,
Those all look fine, but I've just noticed you're building RPMs there and
that's something we don't do with Slurm so
Is no one else affected by this?
/Magnus
On 2014-09-11 14:46, Magnus Jonsson wrote:
Hi!
A user found a strange new behaviour when using --exclusive with srun.
I have an example submit-script[1] that shows this.
I have tested this on 2.6.4 with the output [2] [3] (stderr) and on
14.03.7
Thanks Lech,
That is something to start with. The problem is that I plan to add
submission in the future and don't want to start something that will have
to be changed too much with time. So I would prefer to be able to firstly
execute any slurm command from my webserver and for any user...
Brigham Young University has developed a number of web interfaces to
SLurm. See:
https://marylou.byu.edu/documentation/slurm/script-generator
https://marylou.byu.edu/utilization/
Their Javascript tool to generate batch job scripts is here:
https://github.com/BYUHPC/BYUJobScriptGenerator
Nice !!, I think this gives a much more detailed insight into the problem I
am facing !.
Thanks a lot!
2014-10-02 15:51 GMT+02:00 je...@schedmd.com:
Brigham Young University has developed a number of web interfaces to
SLurm. See:
https://marylou.byu.edu/documentation/slurm/script-generator
I have a job:
scontrol show jobid 49
JobId=49
Name=20141001_17h23_C4_ArXe13nm_dt002.as_nbions00309_nbions00252_SyesIyesEyesTnoRyes_potSymmetric_b01.20_I01.5000e+14_WL13.7nm_FW10.0fs_Lrelaxed_A0.0_ALmd_oclAmd_deepthought
UserId=zhart(1001) GroupId=zhart(1001)
Priority=4294901712
Hello José,
you might be interested in ubmod or its successor open xdmod. It's a system
that queries SLURM regularly, writes the data into its own database and makes
it available via webserver. You'd probably have to implement proper security
measures for user management.
Regards,
Lech
(sent
What keys are you talking about? Are you referring to the script
generator that Moe linked to? It's on github as LGPL with no keys of
any kind: https://github.com/BYUHPC/BYUJobScriptGenerator. It only
creates a script but doesn't submit it. We could easily add that
capability for our own
Well, under:
https://marylou.byu.edu/documentation/apps/api/
At the API Keys section. Is is why I supposed this is for internal use only
and therefore it shouldn't be open-sourced.
The script generator, although very useful is not the purpose of my
research at the moment.
So I understand that
Hi,
Yes, that seems to be the problem. Can someone point me in the right
direction to change the compile scripts? I'm willing to put some effort
into this, but I don't really know where to start.
- Jan
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Blomqvist Janne janne.blomqv...@aalto.fi
wrote:
Hi,
Trying to build Slurm 14.03.6 with FreeIPMI, using
./configure --with-freeipmi=[PATH-to-FREEIPMI]
The configure log showed that the FreeIPMI test program compiles but
fails to link, with a bunch of missing symbols. After some
head-scratching, I discovered that I had to add -lfreeipmi
We're using 14.03.7 with FreeIPMI 1.4.5 and didn't have to do anything
unusual to get it built.
FreeIPMI was built from source into an RPM, then SLURM itself built into an
RPM.
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Architect
*e: * nathan.har...@cfms.org.uk // *t: * 0117 906 1104 // *m: * 07875
Hello,
When the sattach command is used, will the old IO streams of the original srun
command still be available? Or will the IO streams be replaced?
Thanks.
-Andrew
--
Andrew Gontarek
PE Debuggers
Ph: 651-605-9176
Cell: 651-895-0295
Hello,
When the sattach command is used, will the old IO streams of the original srun
command still be available? Or will the IO streams be replaced?
Thanks.
-Andrew
--
Andrew Gontarek
PE Debuggers
Ph: 651-605-9176
Quoting Andrew Gontarek andr...@cray.com:
Hello,
When the sattach command is used, will the old IO streams of the
original srun command still be available?
Yes
Or will the IO streams be replaced?
Thanks.
-Andrew
--
Andrew Gontarek
PE Debuggers
Ph: 651-605-9176
Cell: 651-895-0295
On 03/10/14 03:05, Michael Jennings wrote:
Is your /var/tmp mounted noexec by any chance?
I wondered that but I don't think that'll give the errors that Dennis is
seeing, he's seeing -EACCES for /usr/bin/perl, not for something in
/var/tmp. :-(
--
Christopher SamuelSenior Systems
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Christopher Samuel
sam...@unimelb.edu.au wrote:
Is your /var/tmp mounted noexec by any chance?
I wondered that but I don't think that'll give the errors that Dennis is
seeing, he's seeing -EACCES for /usr/bin/perl, not for something in
/var/tmp. :-(
It's
Unsubscribe
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Christopher Samuel
sam...@unimelb.edu.au wrote:
It's trying to run a script in /var/tmp that has #!/usr/bin/perl in
it. So I suspect /usr is mounted noexec.
Hmm, that would make life, umm, interesting. :-)
Yes, indeed! :-)
That's the only way I've been
23 matches
Mail list logo
