-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/03/14 11:37, Lipari, Don wrote:
> Disclaimer: I found this in an old version (v2.3.3) of Slurm, and
> can't confirm that the problem can still happen.
We see this on both our BG/Q (which was running 2.5.x and now runs
2.6.x) and our Intel cl
rm-dev mailto:slurm-dev@schedmd.com>>
Date: Thursday, March 13, 2014 11:46 PM
To: slurm-dev mailto:slurm-dev@schedmd.com>>
Subject: [slurm-dev] RE: error: We have more allocated time than is possible...
Hi Loris,
We have the same problem and we are also writing a script to "clean&
Hi Loris,
We have the same problem and we are also writing a script to "clean" the
database.
We are interesting by your code. Of course when our script will be written
we will also share it.
Thanks a lot.
Regards
--
Julien
2014-03-14 8:15 GMT+01:00 Loris Bennett :
>
> "Lipari, Don" writes
"Lipari, Don" writes:
> I wanted to add another reason (just discovered today) for the "We have more
> allocated time than is possible" error emitted to the slurmdbd.log.
>
> Disclaimer: I found this in an old version (v2.3.3) of Slurm, and can't
> confirm that the problem can still happen.
>
I wanted to add another reason (just discovered today) for the "We have more
allocated time than is possible" error emitted to the slurmdbd.log.
Disclaimer: I found this in an old version (v2.3.3) of Slurm, and can't
confirm that the problem can still happen.
The slurmctld submits job records
Hi Don,
Upgrading to Slurm 2.5 seems to be the solution in our case.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
luis
On 05/02/2013 06:56 PM, Lipari, Don wrote:
> Have a look at http://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247 and the patches
> that resulted.
> Don
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Luis
Have a look at http://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247 and the patches that
resulted.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Luis Alves [mailto:luis.al...@csc.fi]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 5:07 AM
> To: slurm-dev
> Subject: [slurm-dev] error: We have more allocated time than is
> possi
