[slurm-dev] Re: Failed to contact primary controller : No route to host

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/11/13 16:08, Arjun J Rao wrote: > Yes, it was the firewall rules on my Scientific Linux > installation. Flushed the iptables using iptables -F and now the > slurm daemons talk with the slurm controller just fine. Wonderful! Well done. All th

[slurm-dev] Re: Failed to contact primary controller : No route to host

Yes, it was the firewall rules on my Scientific Linux installation. Flushed the iptables using iptables -F and now the slurm daemons talk with the slurm controller just fine. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/

[slurm-dev] Re: Failed to contact primary controller : No route to host

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/11/13 18:52, Arjun J Rao wrote: > Now I have tried netstat -lnt on qdr1(130.1.2.205) and it shows > this : > > Proto Recv-QSend-Q LocalAddress ForeignAddress > State tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:6817 >