[slurm-dev] Re: Passing binding information
On 02/11/16 02:01, Riebs, Andy wrote: > Interesting -- thanks for the info Chris. No worries, it's a bit sad I think, but I can understand it. -- Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci
[slurm-dev] Re: Passing binding information
Interesting -- thanks for the info Chris. Andy -Original Message- From: Christopher Samuel [mailto:sam...@unimelb.edu.au] Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:23 PM To: slurm-dev <slurm-dev@schedmd.com> Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: Passing binding information On 01/11/16 05:43, Andy Riebs wrote: > Does anyone have any recent experience with this code who can answer > the questions? Unfortunately it looks like all SchedMD folks have dropped off the mailing list (apart from posting announcements), presumably due to workload. You may want to contact them directly. All the best, Chris -- Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci
[slurm-dev] Re: Passing binding information
On 01/11/16 05:43, Andy Riebs wrote: > Does anyone have any recent experience with this code who can answer the > questions? Unfortunately it looks like all SchedMD folks have dropped off the mailing list (apart from posting announcements), presumably due to workload. You may want to contact them directly. All the best, Chris -- Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci
[slurm-dev] Re: Passing binding information
Does anyone have any recent experience with this code who can answer the questions? On 10/27/2016 01:57 PM, Andy Riebs wrote: Hi All, We are trying to figure out the best way for Open MPI (and others?) to pick up the user's CPU binding request. Does this work? Let’s suppose we look for SLURM_CPU_BIND: * if it includes the word “none”, then we know the user specified that they don’t want us to bind * if it includes the word mask_cpu, then we have to check the value of that option. * If it is all F’s, then they didn’t specify a binding and we should do our thing. * If it is anything else, then we assume they _did_ specify a binding, and we leave it alone Would that make sense? Is there anything else that could be in that envar which would trip us up? Thanks Andy -- Andy Riebs1 andy.ri...@hpe.com Hewlett-Packard Enterprise High Performance Computing Software Engineering +1 404 648 9024 My opinions are not necessarily those of HPE May the source be with you! 1 mailto:andy.ri...@hpe.com
