-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/07/13 18:34, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
From a recent message by yours truly to a slurm-dev thread about
slurmctld memory consumption:
Ahh, thanks! Of course the reason we've not run into that yet is that
our existing (Torque) x86 clusters
On 2013-07-20T15:23:41 EEST, Chris Samuel wrote:
Hi there,
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 02:53:52 AM Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:
With the recent changes in glibc in how virtual memory is allocated for
threaded applications, limiting virtual memory usage for threaded
applications is IMO not a good
Hi there,
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 02:53:52 AM Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:
With the recent changes in glibc in how virtual memory is allocated for
threaded applications, limiting virtual memory usage for threaded
applications is IMO not a good idea. (One example: our slurcltd has
allocated 16.1
