Hi All,
I’m trying to build pmix 3.1.1 against slurm 18.08.4, however in the slurm
pmix plugin I get a fatal error:
pmixp_client.c:147:28: error: ‘flag’ undeclared (first use in this
function)
PMIX_VAL_SET(>value, flag, 0);
Is there something wrong with my build environment?
Hi,
We encounter a strange issue on our system (Slurm 18.08.3), and I'm
curious whether anyone of you recognizes this behavior. In the
following example we try to reboot 32 nodes, of which 31 nodes are
idle:
root# scontrol reboot ASAP nextstate=resume reason=image r8n[1-32]
root# sinfo -o "%100E
Hi everyone,
I am scratching my head to find a way to do this on slurm. We have three
nodes configured as such:
> # COMPUTE NODES
> NodeName=brassica NodeAddr=10.1.10.83 CPUs=64 RealMemory=95 Sockets=4
> CoresPerSocket=8 ThreadsPerCore=2 State=UNKNOWN
> NodeName=triticum NodeAddr=10.1.10.170
Thank you Chris.
This is what I assumed since setting those Variables for complicated
Allocations may be just useless. Yet I wasn’t sure if it was possible at all.
Best,
Andreas
> Am 19.01.2019 um 08:39 schrieb Chris Samuel :
>
>> On 18/1/19 3:18 am, Henkel wrote:
>>
>> we just found
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
> New version at
> https://github.com/OleHolmNielsen/Slurm_tools/tree/master/nodes
Nice. Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Bjørn-Helge Mevik, dr. scient,
Department for Research Computing, University of Oslo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 1/21/19 12:18 PM, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
Comments and suggestions are most welcome!
Splendid tool! I immediately found that I'd forgotten to take a few
nodes out of the topology definition. :)
Me too :-)
One thing: The script doesn't work if you have
Hi Bjørn-Helge,
Thanks:
On 1/21/19 12:37 PM, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:
Two more details/enhancements:
1) Sites which use node names like c[1-20]-[1-36], would benefit from
"sort -V" instead of just sort -- otherwise c10-12 will be listed before
c2-12, for instance. (For sites that use names
Two more details/enhancements:
1) Sites which use node names like c[1-20]-[1-36], would benefit from
"sort -V" instead of just sort -- otherwise c10-12 will be listed before
c2-12, for instance. (For sites that use names like c[01-20]-[01-36]
there is no difference.) Not very important, but
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
> Comments and suggestions are most welcome!
Splendid tool! I immediately found that I'd forgotten to take a few
nodes out of the topology definition. :)
One thing: The script doesn't work if you have different NodeName and
NodeHostName on the nodes in slurm.conf,
Hi Slurm users,
When removing dead nodes or adding new nodes, I've too often made the
mistake of forgetting to update correctly the /etc/slurm/topology.conf file.
Therefore I wrote a simple "checktopology" tool to check the consistency
of /etc/slurm/topology.conf with the nodelist in
10 matches
Mail list logo
