Hi Chagai,
there isn't, no. As far as I can tell, SLURM only knows share-tree, it
doesn't have functional share like SGE/UGE.
(I'm pretty sure what Chagai wants to happen is this:
There's a share policy on the cluster that only ever operates in the
moment (i.e. per scheduling run). No
Hi Chagai,
Chagai Nota writes:
> Hi Loris
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> I tired to configure it and I didn't get desired results.
> This is my configuration:
> PriorityType=priority/multifactor
> PriorityDecayHalfLife=0
> PriorityUsageResetPeriod=DAILY
> PriorityFavorSmall=yes
>
Wow thanks for your detailed answer.
I'm coming from SGE, and I thought that there will be simple way to make it
behave like SGE.
As you said hard limits will be waste of resources so it's not good option.
-Original Message-
From: slurm-users On Behalf Of Paul
Edmon
Sent: Tuesday,
So you want a purely fractional usage of the cluster. That's hard to do
via fairshare or with out fairshare as the scheduler will usually fill
up all the nodes with the top priority job. If you don't have fairshare
running or any historical data it will revert to FIFO. So which ever
user
Hi Loris
Thanks for your answer.
I tired to configure it and I didn't get desired results.
This is my configuration:
PriorityType=priority/multifactor
PriorityDecayHalfLife=0
PriorityUsageResetPeriod=DAILY
PriorityFavorSmall=yes
PriorityWeightFairshare=10
PriorityWeightAge=0
1. I don’t see where you specifying a “Default” partition (DEFAULT=yes)
2. In “NodeName=* ” you have Gres=gpu:2 (All nodes on that line have 2
GPUs.) Create another “NodeName” line below and list your non-gpu nodes there
without the GRES flag.
From: slurm-users On Behalf Of
Hello,
I am using slurm 21.08. I am stuck with the following.
Q1 : I have 8 nodes with 2 gpus each and 128 cores with 512 GB RAM. I want
to distribute each node's resources in 2 partitions so that "par1"
partition will have 2 gpus with 64 cores and 256 GB ram of the node and
the other partition
Hi Chagai,
Chagai Nota writes:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I would like to ask if there is any option that slurm scheduler will consider
> only running jobs and not historical data.
>
> We don’t care about how many jobs users was running in the past but only the
> current usage.
Look at
Hi
I would like to ask if there is any option that slurm scheduler will consider
only running jobs and not historical data.
We don't care about how many jobs users was running in the past but only the
current usage.
Thanks
Chagai Nota
Important Notice: This
