Re: [slurm-users] Way MaxRSS should be interpreted

is a good estimate of how much RAM is needed to run a given job. Gareth From: slurm-users [mailto:slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com] On Behalf Of E.S. Rosenberg Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2018 10:42 PM To: Slurm User Community List <slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com> Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Way

Re: [slurm-users] Way MaxRSS should be interpreted

Hi Loris, Thanks for your explanation! I would have interpreted as max(sum()). Is there a way to get max(sum()) or at least sum form of sum()? The assumption that all processes are peaking at the same value is not a valid one unless all threads have essentially the same workload... Thanks again!

Re: [slurm-users] Way MaxRSS should be interpreted

Hi Eli, "E.S. Rosenberg" writes: > Hi fellow slurm users, > We have been struggling for a while with understanding how MaxRSS is reported. > > This because jobs often die with MaxRSS not even approaching 10% of the > requested memory sometimes. > > I just found