Re: [slurm-users] wckey specification error

On Wednesday, 2 May 2018 8:50:12 PM AEST John Hearns wrote: > One learning pointgrep -i is a good default option. This ignores the > case of the search, so you would have found WCKey a bit faster. Also if you need to search recursively below a point then: git grep --no-index -i

Re: [slurm-users] wckey specification error

Mahmood, good to hear you have a solution. One learning pointgrep -i is a good default option. This ignores the case of the search, so you would have found WCKey a bit faster. On 2 May 2018 at 04:26, Mahmood Naderan wrote: > Thanks Trevor for pointing out that

Re: [slurm-users] wckey specification error

Thanks Trevor for pointing out that there is an option for such thing is slurm.conf. Although I previously greped for *wc* and found nothing, the correct name is TrackWCKey which is set to "yes" by default. After setting that to "no", the error disappeared. About the comments on Rocks and the

Re: [slurm-users] wckey specification error

> On May 1, 2018, at 2:58 AM, John Hearns wrote: > > Rocks 7 is now available, which is based on CentOS 7.4 > I hate to be uncharitable, but I am not a fan of Rocks. I speak from > experience, having installed my share of Rocks clusters. > The philosophy just does not

Re: [slurm-users] wckey specification error

I quickly downloaded that roll and unpacked the RPMs. I cannot quite see how SLurm is configured, so to my shame I gave up (I did say that Rocks was not my thing) On 1 May 2018 at 11:58, John Hearns wrote: > Rocks 7 is now available, which is based on CentOS 7.4 > I hate

Re: [slurm-users] wckey specification error

On Tuesday, 1 May 2018 2:45:21 PM AEST Mahmood Naderan wrote: > The wckey explanation in the manual [1] is not meaningful at the > moment. Can someone explain that? I've never used it, but it sounds like you've configured your system to require it (or perhaps Rocks has done that?).