[slurm-users] ignore gpu resources to scheduled the cpu based jobs

Hi All, In our environment we have GPU. so what i found is if the user having high priority and his job is in queue and waiting for the GPU resources which are almost full and not available. so the other user submitted the job which does not require the GPU resources are in queue even though lots

Re: [slurm-users] unable to start slurmd process.

Hi Team, After my Analysis i found that the user used the qdel command which is a plugin with slurm and the job is not killed properly and it makes the slurmstepd process in a kind of hung state. so when i was trying to start the slurmd the process was not getting started.after killing those

Re: [slurm-users] Fairshare per-partition?

I think that’s correct. From notes I’ve got for how we want to handle our fairshare in the future: Setting up a funded account (which can be assigned a fairshare): sacctmgr add account member1 Description="Member1 Description" FairShare=N Adding/removing a user to/from the funded

[slurm-users] Fairshare per-partition?

Hello all. Is it possible to configure Slurm so that fairshare calc on a partition does not impact calc on a different one? We'd need to have different "priorities" on the "postprocessing" nodes than the ones on "parallel" nodes, so that even if an user already used up all his "quota" on