Re: [slurm-users] missing info from sacct

2020-11-18 Thread Andy Riebs
Hi Navin, I can't help with the sreport problem, but I did recognize the situation with the gap in job numbers (the use of federation), and jumped in for that one. Since this list is completely populated by volunteers, there is no one "assigned" to topic areas, but people jump in where they

Re: [slurm-users] missing info from sacct

2020-11-18 Thread navin srivastava
Thank you Andy. but when i am trying to get the utilization for the months it says it is 100%. when i tried to find it using utilization by user it gives me a very different value which i am unable to understand. deda1x1466:~ # sreport cluster AccountUtilizationByUser start=10/02/20

Re: [slurm-users] missing info from sacct

2020-11-18 Thread Andy Riebs
I see from your subsequent post that you're using a pair of clusters with a single database, so yes, you are using federation. The high order bits of the Job ID identify the cluster that ran the job, so you will typically have a huge gap between ranges of Job IDs. Andy On 11/18/2020 9:15

[slurm-users] missing info from sacct

2020-11-18 Thread navin srivastava
While running the sacct we found that some jobid are not listing. 5535566 SYNTHLIBT+ stdg_defq stdg_acc 1 COMPLETED 0:0 5535567 SYNTHLIBT+ stdg_defq stdg_acc 1 COMPLETED 0:0 11016496 jupyter-s+ stdg_defq stdg_acc 1RUNNING 0:0