Re: [slurm-users] "allocated+" status

2018-04-17 Thread Andy Riebs
Hmmm... the man page says of "reduce_completing_frag," "By default if a job is found completing then no jobs are scheduled. If this parameter is used the node in a completing job are taken out of consideration." This feels like it's missing a word or two. The first sentence says that, by def

Re: [slurm-users] "allocated+" status

2018-04-16 Thread Andy Riebs
Thanks Kilian! On 04/16/2018 02:15 PM, Kilian Cavalotti wrote: Hi Andy, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Andy Riebs wrote: I hadn't realized that jobs can be scheduled to run on a node that is still in "completing" state from an earlier job. We occasionally use epilog scripts that can take 3

Re: [slurm-users] "allocated+" status

2018-04-16 Thread Kilian Cavalotti
Hi Andy, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Andy Riebs wrote: > I hadn't realized that jobs can be scheduled to run on a node that is still > in "completing" state from an earlier job. We occasionally use epilog > scripts that can take 30 seconds or longer, and we really don't want the > next job t