2009/6/24 Luca Capello l...@pca.it:
The major problem here is that we need too many extra stuff: a new
kernel, a new libdrm and then a new xf86-video-glamo. Moreover, since
libdrm is already in Debian main, we should coordinate any new package
upload with its maintainer.
If it gets ready
Hi Timo!
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:26:23 +0200, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
2009/6/14 Luca Capello l...@pca.it:
However, I cannot find upstream Git commit 0f03b39435910, which causes
the problem above.
http://git.openmoko.org/?p=xf86-video-glamo.git;a=commit;h=0f03b39435910933a34f5b5dccbc57fb55a2b6f1
2009/6/14 Luca Capello l...@pca.it:
[...] [--rotate orientation] [...]
[-o orientation] [...]
Since xf86-video-glamo claims to be RandR 1.2 compatible, the --rotate
option must work as well, which is not the case.
Ah, no wonder I was puzzled about rotations not working. Yes
2009/6/12 Luca Capello l...@pca.it:
This is a workaround for a Xglamo bug. This should be fixed
in Xglamo and not in kernel space.
If unsure, say N.
Can this be related to http://bugs.debian.org/529078?
Not directly. I heard from Lindi that having that workaround
Hi Timo!
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:04:33 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com writes:
Not directly. I heard from Lindi that having that workaround not
disabled causes crash in rotating eventually, but not immediately. I
was able to xrandr -o left xrandr -o
Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com writes:
2009/6/9 Luca Capello l...@pca.it:
Nothing is ready, because I need to tag the upstream version as well.
Would it be too early to deprecate xserver-glamo in favor of
xserver-xorg-video-glamo by adding also
CONFIG_MFD_GLAMO_FB_XGLAMO_WORKAROUND=n to
