Re: Locally extending trusted certificates

hi there, just wanted to follow-up on this query and see if we have a solution to this problem? /manik On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > This question came up in the context of Docker registries with self-signed > certificates: >

Re: Classic confinement and core_dynamic_linker

On 18/01/17 13:12, Sergio Schvezov wrote: After a quick but thorough conversation with Gustavo we agreed that this is the wrong path to take as it might not be deterministic or people might get surprised about things included that shouldn't have been. There needs to be a clear line between

Re: Classic confinement and core_dynamic_linker

On 18/01/17 02:21, Sergio Schvezov wrote: The logic is still run, but the resulting binary in classic uses rpath and no dynamic loading so there is no resolution to a on-system library we can pick up. I guess we can do some magic, but it feels it might be either fragile or make the build

Re: Error using custom image

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:42:27 +, Luke Williams wrote: > Hello, > > We are trying to build a custom image with a custom kernel. The > kernel build and making the image goes without a hitch, however, > when we try to run it in Virtual Box, we get the following > error: > > > > And it fails to

Re: create-user primitive

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > Don't see a reason to go beyond not listing it. The command works fine, > including proper help and reasonable error messages. > > The reason it prevents creating users when one already exists is so we > don't see

Re: Hi

Sunny, Can you please mail your request in to . /Manik On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Sunny Bhayani < sunny.bhay...@einfochips.com> wrote: > Hi Manik, > > > Thank you for your time. > > > Actually, we have some technical query, related to the ubuntu-image

Re: [announce] twistypuzzle snap

Thank you for the bug report and the feedback! I think I know how to fix that bug. The .yaml file is here... https://github.com/spencerparkin/TwistyPuzzle/blob/stable-release/Snap/snapcraft.yaml Compared to Microsoft's "snapping process," Ubuntu snaps are infinitely better. I have actually

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

Sorry for not being clear. In addition to the suggestion about ubuntu-download-manager, I also wrote this: "Note that part of the rationale of having unity8-contacts and unity8-calendar named like that was that these interfaces are likely to change in meaningful and incompatible ways in the near

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

Sorry, that was my entire point, I guess I should have expanded on it a bit. I agree with ubuntu-download-manager as a name, since that's the name developers will be interacting with if they're using our SDK. For example under QML they're importing Ubuntu.DownloadManager and the C++ namespace is

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:47:27 -0500 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 18/01/17 06:41, Dave Morley wrote: > > Not so happy on 14.04 paste.ubuntu.com/23821653/ I get a > > segfault :( > > Can you report a bug and include 'snap --version' please? > > Thank you! > Mark > Done

Pi2 and 3 image improvements (GLES, GPIO)

hi, at [1] you can now find a daily image build for the Pi2 and Pi3 that both have full GLES support and all 26 GPIOs exposed through interfaces, some test feedback would be nice :) the GPIO numbering and pin mapping follows the community map at [2] and looks like [3] in the "snap interfaces"

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On 18/01/17 06:41, Dave Morley wrote: > Not so happy on 14.04 paste.ubuntu.com/23821653/ I get a segfault :( Can you report a bug and include 'snap --version' please? Thank you! Mark signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

The second part of the point was cut out. Can you please at least let us know how you feel about it, so we can be in sync about the right decision. On Jan 18, 2017 1:02 PM, "Mike Sheldon" wrote: ubuntu-download-manager makes sense as a name to me, especially as

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:01:34 + Mike Sheldon wrote: > ubuntu-download-manager makes sense as a name to me, especially as > it's one of the APIs in the Ubuntu SDK. > > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 12:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > > > The real issue with

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

ubuntu-download-manager makes sense as a name to me, especially as it's one of the APIs in the Ubuntu SDK. On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 12:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > The real issue with download-manager is that it's too general. We all > have several download managers in our systems, so this

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On 18/01/17 14:38, Dave Morley wrote: > https://asciinema.org/a/c7ohu56eupwnq6noyua2k0eum https://asciinema.org/a/3ymbowr1pk6usww8v1iyveai9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

The real issue with download-manager is that it's too general. We all have several download managers in our systems, so this gives no hint of what it's really talking about. We can call it ubuntu-download-manager if that's how the software was named. Note that part of the rationale of having

Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

Hi all,  Currently the interface for UDM (Ubuntu Download Manager) has been named unity8-download-manager. It's my understanding that whilst we might initially be bundling UDM within the unity8 snap to make the first stages of development easier (e.g. so it can talk directly to unity8's transfer

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:41:49 +, Dave Morley wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 04:16:45 -0500 > Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > >> Hi folks >> >> (For those of you who Gmail does not filter this email on >> as-yet-unexplained-grounds :)) >> >> Please could you test my asciinema snap?

Re: create-user primitive

Don't see a reason to go beyond not listing it. The command works fine, including proper help and reasonable error messages. The reason it prevents creating users when one already exists is so we don't see scripts opening back doors by mistake. As Michael points out, this may be overriden with

Re: Classic confinement and core_dynamic_linker

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:17:27 +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 17/01/17 22:22, Sergio Schvezov wrote:

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 04:16:45 -0500 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Hi folks > > (For those of you who Gmail does not filter this email on > as-yet-unexplained-grounds :)) > > Please could you test my asciinema snap? Asciinema is a console video > recording utility that's great for

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On 18/01/17 06:12, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:40:47 +, Jamie Bennett wrote: >> On 18/01/17 at 04:19am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: >>> ... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in >>> /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure you have the very latest snapd. >> Yes,

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:40:47 +, Jamie Bennett wrote: > On 18/01/17 at 04:19am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: >> >> ... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in >> /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure you have the very latest snapd. > > Yes, classic needs snapd 2.21 from proposed otherwise

Re: Classic confinement and core_dynamic_linker

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:58:00 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > The question asked was actually how to get snapcraft to include > dependencies *inside the snap* so that it works as it does with strict > snaps, bundling the dependencies. > > Your response was about system libraries

Re: Classic confinement and core_dynamic_linker

Hi Sergio, The question asked was actually how to get snapcraft to include dependencies *inside the snap* so that it works as it does with strict snaps, bundling the dependencies. Your response was about system libraries rather than bundled in-snap libraries, I believe. This should definitely

RE: Serial Port Plug/Interface issue with Ubuntu-core 16.04 (#2557)

Can anyone please guide me how to start writing gadget snap which gives me access to serial port interface on my Raspberry Pi board and x86_64 ubuntu machine. Regards, Mritunjai From: Mritunjai Singh Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:06 AM To: 'Snapcraft'

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

On 18/01/17 at 04:19am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > ... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in > /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure you have the very latest snapd. Yes, classic needs snapd 2.21 from proposed otherwise you will not be able to find or install the snap. After that,

Re: ubuntu core + snap + gpios

hi, Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2017, 23:31 + schrieb Luís Martins: > Hi, I was trying to build a simple snap to test the ubuntu core > raspberry pi 3 gpios [1] but for some reason the app does not seem > allowed to write into /sys/class/gpio/ within my snap. > > I declared the "plugs: [gpio]" in

Please test my asciinema snap

Hi folks (For those of you who Gmail does not filter this email on as-yet-unexplained-grounds :)) Please could you test my asciinema snap? Asciinema is a console video recording utility that's great for CLI-diven demos. If you want to make a quick web video of a CLI / console journey, asciinema

Re: Yet more issues snapping

On 2017-01-18 08:41, Evan Dandrea wrote: On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 at 02:08 Gareth France wrote: On 16/01/17 23:58, Loïc Minier wrote: I suggest you try running your Travis build inside a 16.04 environment; it seems this is achieved by running the 16.04 Docker

Re: [announce] twistypuzzle snap

Great work Spencer. I presume your project is hosted on GitHub at: * https://github.com/spencerparkin/TwistyPuzzle I don't see a snapcraft.yaml file there so I would be interested in what it looks like and how you found the whole process. After playing with it briefly I have filed the

Re: Yet more issues snapping

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 at 02:08 Gareth France wrote: > > On 16/01/17 23:58, Loïc Minier wrote: > > I suggest you try running your Travis build inside a 16.04 > > environment; it seems this is achieved by running the 16.04 Docker > > container. > Thank you, but how do