Re: classic snap fails to find libraries

I dunno if there's a bug open for it, but I mentioned another workaround earlier this month: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/2017-January/002307.html On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Leo Arias wrote: > After reading the other thread about a similar issue, I

Re: classic snap fails to find libraries

After reading the other thread about a similar issue, I moved my libraries to stage-packages and that worked. My problem now is that ssh can't call a binary from a snap, it will only work using the full path. Let's say I have the hello snap installed in 192.168.122.24. Then:

SDL2 / Kivy keyboard event not firing in Snap

Hi, I'm trying to use Kivy ( https://kivy.org/#home ) inside a snap. It mostly works, but some SDL2 events don't occur. If I run the application from outside of a snap the events do happen. Specifically, the textinput event works outside of a snap, not inside of a snap. This is the code I'm

Re: Pi2 and 3 image improvements (GLES, GPIO)

Perhaps something else is broken, because I'm trying installing mir-libs, mir-kiosk and mir-kiosk-apps on the latest raspi 2 image (on a Raspberry Pi 2, of course), and on the amd64 image on a kvm, and I can't even get mir-kiosk to launch and show the black screen with the pointer. Both the raspi2

Re: Configuring snapd on ubuntu core for a web proxy

Here we go, thanks! https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1658815 On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > *the local snapd > > > On Jan 23, 2017 8:04 PM, "Gustavo Niemeyer" wrote: > > Indeed, that smells like a bug, certainly

Re: Configuring snapd on ubuntu core for a web proxy

*the local snapd On Jan 23, 2017 8:04 PM, "Gustavo Niemeyer" wrote: Indeed, that smells like a bug, certainly because snap download doesn't use the local snaps to actually download the file. That should be transparent to the CLI though. Can you please file an issue?

Re: Configuring snapd on ubuntu core for a web proxy

Indeed, that smells like a bug, certainly because snap download doesn't use the local snaps to actually download the file. That should be transparent to the CLI though. Can you please file an issue? Thanks! On Jan 23, 2017 5:26 PM, "Max Brustkern" wrote: > Okay,

Spread Tests with proxy (mostly go get)

I'm trying to run spread tests on an ubuntu core VM in a lab that needs to use a proxy for web access. The mirrors are redirected, so the package installations work as expected, but I run into problems with go get: ++ classic 'GOPATH=/home/gopath go get ../../home/gopath/src/

Re: Yet more issues snapping

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:53 AM, wrote: > It is ok now thank you. I have had some excellent help and can use what I > now have to aid me going forward. It is those first few steps that seem > impossible. Hey Gareth, I'm happy to see you got it working. It would

Re: Pi2 and 3 image improvements (GLES, GPIO)

Hey all, thanks for the hard work getting this image into shape. I've been trying to run on a Raspi3 the Mir-kiosk-apps demo from: https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/snappy/guides/mir-snaps/ but I've not had much success. End of last week the demos would crash, and Mir would shut down after a few

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > I will be looking at the security policy side of this so if you can, please > comment in the bug what specific commands you are using in your snap for using > rt_tables so I can repeat tham and make sure they are

Re: Configuring snapd on ubuntu core for a web proxy

Okay, you're right. I was testing with snap download, which doesn't seem to use to proxy, whereas snap refresh does. Is that intended behavior, or should I report it somewhere? Thanks, Max On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer < gustavo.nieme...@canonical.com> wrote: > This should

Re: Configuring snapd on ubuntu core for a web proxy

This should work fine across reboots. On Jan 23, 2017 4:49 PM, "Max Brustkern" wrote: > So I've been able to get it to work by creating > /etc/systemd/system/snapd.service.d/proxy.conf > with the correct settings. Any suggestions on getting that to persist > across

Re: GPG error during "sudo apt update" in "classic" snap

Hi Oli, Thanks for the information. I think I'll just wait for the notes. Jian On Jan 23, 2017 15:02, "Oliver Grawert" wrote: hi, Am Montag, den 23.01.2017, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Jian LUO: > > > I'll try kernel w/o real-time patch next time. Will let you guys know > if it

Re: Configuring snapd on ubuntu core for a web proxy

So I've been able to get it to work by creating /etc/systemd/system/snapd.service.d/proxy.conf with the correct settings. Any suggestions on getting that to persist across reboots? Thanks, Max On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 17:17 +0100, Luca Dionisi wrote: > Hi all > > I see that the issue has been taken care of. I will immediately > download a daily-build image and check that the file rt_tables > is writeable. > > I haven't built a snap for my app yet, so I cannot test for the > moment if my

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

That'd be ideal, thanks! On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Mike Sheldon wrote: > Okay great, should I prepare a new branch that does the renaming? > > On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 14:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > Sounds good. If you think ubuntu-download-manager

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

Okay great, should I prepare a new branch that does the renaming? On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 14:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > Sounds good. If you think ubuntu-download-manager is the way to go, > let's move on with it. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Mike Sheldon

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > It's definitely possible. It's just not very convenient yet. > > For tests, easiest might be to bind mount your modifications at runtime. Ok, thanks. bind mount. -- Snapcraft mailing list

Re: systemd reload (ExevReload) support

Nice change, Boris! Would you like to submit a PR for that? We have a CLA you can easily sign online assuming you're happy with the terms: https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/contributors On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Boris Rybalkin wrote: > Yes, I had to add support on

Re: Naming for the Ubuntu Download Manager interface

Sounds good. If you think ubuntu-download-manager is the way to go, let's move on with it. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Mike Sheldon wrote: > Ah, my mistake. I'd suspect UDM is less likely to change since it's > already a public facing API being used in third

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

It's definitely possible. It's just not very convenient yet. For tests, easiest might be to bind mount your modifications at runtime. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Luca Dionisi wrote: > Hi all > > I see that the issue has been taken care of. I will immediately >

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

Hi all I see that the issue has been taken care of. I will immediately download a daily-build image and check that the file rt_tables is writeable. I haven't built a snap for my app yet, so I cannot test for the moment if my needs are all already fitted in the builtin interfaces. I will try as

[NEWS] KDE Application snaps in stable channel

It should be giving an instruction to install framework snap and prevent snap installation like it does when ubuntu-app-platform snap is missing for the snaps that require it. On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, 3:54 p.m. Michael Hall, wrote: > With the release of Snapd 2.20 (and

Re: [NEWS] KDE Application snaps in stable channel

> On 23 Jan 2017, at 14:54, Michael Hall wrote: > > With the release of Snapd 2.20 (and corresponding Snapcraft release) > that introduced the new dbus interface, Harold Sitter from KDE was > unblocked on the last thing keeping KDE applications from being cleanly > snapped

Re: Error using custom image

I created a bug and uploaded my snapcraft.yaml to the bug as well as the kernel.snap. It is bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-image/+bug/1658177 The cmdline boots kernel.img from my snap using the x1 revision. (Fb-kernel-x1.snap) which is located in /bar/lib/snapd/snaps Let me know if you

Re: Snapcraft 2.25 has been released.

Hi Olivier, Sorry, I do not understand what exactly you mean "no app in the snap is named like the snap itself". Could you please elaborate it more? Thanks & best regards, XiaoGuo On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Olivier Tilloy < olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi XiaoGuo, > > Your

Re: desktop file not appearing

Thank you very much, that was the issue! Cheers, Fabio On 23 January 2017 at 14:59, Michael Hall wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > Most likely the problem is in your .desktop file's Exec= line. This > should point to the executable name in /snap/bin/ which, looking at your >

Re: desktop file not appearing

Hi Fabio, Most likely the problem is in your .desktop file's Exec= line. This should point to the executable name in /snap/bin/ which, looking at your snapcraft.yaml, would be fcole90-hexgl-webapp.hexgl-webapp If you change it to: Exec=fcole90-hexgl-webapp.hexgl-webapp It should work. Michael

Re: GPG error during "sudo apt update" in "classic" snap

Hi Gustavo, Unfortunately the stock kernel refused to run on my target. Would it be useful if I upload my kernel configuration? I got same error message on another omap4460 target which runs ti-rt-linux-4.4.y[1]. My rpi 2 w/ official image however does not have this problem. I'll try kernel w/o

Re: Snapcraft 2.25 has been released.

Hi XiaoGuo, Your example happens to work because no app in the snap is named like the snap itself. For such snaps, using the new desktop feature should be safe. Cheers, Olivier On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:48 AM, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > Based on the

Re: Pi2 and 3 image improvements (GLES, GPIO)

Super nice indeed. Thanks, Oliver! Has anyone tried the new GL and gpios? How did it go? Perhaps we can ask for some extra millage on the pi community list itself? On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > > at [1] you can now find a daily image build

Re: GPG error during "sudo apt update" in "classic" snap

This smells like an apparmor denial, which shouldn't happen inside the classic snap itself. Can you reproduce the issue when using the stock kernel? On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Jian LUO wrote: > Hi list, > > as the topic suggested I got GPG error in classic snap

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

Yes, it seems fine for network-control to allow it. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Samstag, den 21.01.2017, 11:33 +0100 schrieb Luca Dionisi: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Oliver Grawert > > wrote: > > > > > > yes,

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

hi, Am Samstag, den 21.01.2017, 11:33 +0100 schrieb Luca Dionisi: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Oliver Grawert > wrote: > > > > yes, please start by filing it under the snappy umbrella [1] > > project > > and we'll add the necessary bug tasks for all bits and pieces > >

Re: Ubuntu Core: how the file-system works

Hi Luca, If you look under interfaces/builtin in the source code of snapd, you'll find some familliar names if you list *network* and *firewall* in there. I suspect that what you want is very easy to fix by simply introducing an additional apparmor entry in the right interface. If you want to

Re: Best practise for gstreamer plugins?

First thing I would do is include whatever you need inside the snap itself, and get things working quickly. Then, there are a few different ways you can move from there. The first one is actually to do nothing.. the whole snap infrastructure (snapcraft, snapd, uploads, downloads) is becoming

Re: create-user primitive

It's okay that the command itself isn't super visible. The main reason it exists is to back console-conf, which is very visible and should be properly documented. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Manik Taneja wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer