Re: LDC compiler snap issues on 14.04 (ABI compatibility?)

2017-02-15 Thread Sergio Schvezov
El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017 20h'09:36 ART, Joseph Rushton Wakeling escribió: On 11/02/17 17:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: I just reproduced the issue in a VirtualBox install of 14.04 to get these details. Kernel report in kern.log: Feb 11 17:16:19

Re: LDC compiler snap issues on 14.04 (ABI compatibility?)

2017-02-15 Thread Manik Taneja
jamie, any insights? /manik On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On 11/02/17 17:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > >> I just reproduced the issue in a VirtualBox install of 14.04 to get these >> details. Kernel report in kern.log:

Re: LDC compiler snap issues on 14.04 (ABI compatibility?)

2017-02-15 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 11/02/17 17:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: I just reproduced the issue in a VirtualBox install of 14.04 to get these details. Kernel report in kern.log: Feb 11 17:16:19 vb1404 kernel: [ 534.781526] traps: gcc[6209] general protection ip:7f6632d1b1ee sp:7fff0a09e2f0 error:0 in

Bug tracking for the Snap Store

2017-02-15 Thread Bret A. Barker
Just a quick FYI, we now have a Launchpad project for tracking bugs and issues related to all aspects of the Snap Store: https://launchpad.net/snapstore You can also find us in #snappy on Freenode IRC. And a reminder that there are also: https://launchpad.net/snapd - for issues specific to

Re: Remove revision from store

2017-02-15 Thread Aaron Hampton
Thanks. It seems to be the same problem with a missing .desktop file. It should exist, though. Any chance you could reject that one, too, and I'll look into it further before pushing another update. Thanks for all the help, Aaron On Feb 15, 2017 4:54 PM, "Daniel Manrique"

Re: Remove revision from store

2017-02-15 Thread Aaron Hampton
Hi, What information do you need? Is the snap ID enough? It is: AW8uZ7ZTD6dC6iD1eboxmPyzGxB0pion Thanks again, Aaron On Feb 15, 2017 3:25 PM, "Daniel Manrique" wrote: > Hello Aaron, > > We're looking at ways to make the queueish nature of a snap's upload > both

Remove revision from store

2017-02-15 Thread Aaron Hampton
Hi, Is it possible to remove a revision of an application I uploaded? It currently has Manual review pending for its status because I failed to included a .desktop file when one was required. I've since fixed that issue in subsequent revisions, but their reviews are pending a previous review. I'd

Re: Announcing channel tracks for long-term stable snaps

2017-02-15 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:46:21PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote: > Hola! > > To publish stable snaps of different versions at the same time, like Go 1.6 > and 1.7, we now have ‘channel tracks’ in beta. > > Each track has its own set of risk-based channels: stable, candidate, beta, > edge. So

Re: Announcing channel tracks for long-term stable snaps

2017-02-15 Thread Bret A. Barker
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:46:21PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote: > Hola! > > To publish stable snaps of different versions at the same time, like Go 1.6 > and 1.7, we now have ‘channel tracks’ in beta. > > Each track has its own set of risk-based channels: stable, candidate, beta, > edge. So

Re: HowTo: How to create a snap for a Python app with networking using snapcraft in Ubuntu 16.04

2017-02-15 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Didier Roche wrote: > Le 10/02/2017 à 17:30, Simos Xenitellis a écrit : >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Didier Roche wrote: >>> Le 07/02/2017 à 14:05, Simos Xenitellis a écrit : On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:13 AM,

Re: Issue with ubuntu OS snap first time boot.

2017-02-15 Thread knitzsche
probably this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi2/+bug/1652270 On 02/13/2017 11:04 PM, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: Today, I had the same problem. I downloaded the Raspberry Pi3 image at: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/16/stable/ The date is: ubuntu-core-16-pi3.img.xz

Automatic restart of daemons on snap installation

2017-02-15 Thread Danilo Šegan
Hi all, We are using snaps to deliver software to juju deployed units, and we are hitting a bit of a blocker: upon snap installation, daemons provided by a snap get unconditionally enabled and (re)started. I've filed a bug already:   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664163 But I wonder what do