Re: netplan and post-up/pre-down scripts

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre < mathieu.trudel-lapie...@canonical.com> wrote: > I agree booting should continue for any device that is down even if it's > configured and marked as fine to still be down. I think rather than trying > to skip a long delay that would happen

Re: netplan and post-up/pre-down scripts

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Would 'got-link' and 'lost-link' be good names for this? > I'm not certain a new event name is needed for this functionality; it seems to me that the current definition of 'up' isn't quite correct.[1] (But all this

Re: netplan and post-up/pre-down scripts

Hi Martin, Thanks for the reply. >Let me explain my use case: when an interface goes up or down, I want > to > > be able to do event-driven things with the network configuration, such as > > add or remove routes, run a DHCP client, etc. > > These two and more are already supported by