icon for snap

Hi, In the older version of snapcraft (1.1.0) I used the icon keyword in the yaml file to specify the icon for my .snap. It seems that this is deprecated in snapcraft 2.22.1 : DEPRECATED: 'icon' defined in snapcraft.yaml. Look at

Re: Use of the dump plugin in snapcraft 2.22.1

Hi James, Thanks, yes now I can manage with the dump plugin. Jenny On 8 December 2016 at 10:50, James Tait wrote: > Hi Jenny, > > On 8 December 2016 at 10:14, Jenny Murphy > wrote: > > Hi, >> I have been trying to upgrade a snapcraft file

Re: icon for snap

Hi, That is fine, it is not urgent for me, I can wait. Jenny On 8 December 2016 at 13:38, Renato Filho wrote: > Right now, I am putting the icon and the desktop file into > "/setup/gui/[app.desktop | icon.*]". > > This will show the icon into the store. But as

Re: icon for snap

Right now, I am putting the icon and the desktop file into "/setup/gui/[app.desktop | icon.*]". This will show the icon into the store. But as Didier mentioned sergio has plans to restore the "icon" and a new field for the destkop file. Cheers, Renato 2016-12-08 10:30 GMT-03:00 Didier Roche

Re: Use of the dump plugin in snapcraft 2.22.1

Hi Jenny, On 8 December 2016 at 10:14, Jenny Murphy wrote: Hi, > I have been trying to upgrade a snapcraft file I had which used the copy > plugin with snapcraft 1.1.0. My newer version of snapcraft 2.22.1. > I am aware that the copy plugin is now deprecated and I

Use of the dump plugin in snapcraft 2.22.1

Hi, I have been trying to upgrade a snapcraft file I had which used the copy plugin with snapcraft 1.1.0. My newer version of snapcraft 2.22.1. I am aware that the copy plugin is now deprecated and I should use the dump plugin. I could actually like to copy the contents of a directory : So

New stable core snap

Hi, The Snappy Team are happy to announce that we have a new version of the "core" snap in the stable channel. It is based on snapd 2.18.1 and contains all the good features of 2.18 that got announced in [1]. In addition we did some small and targeted fixes that resulted in two more candidate

Re: dbus activation running wrong binary

Assuming the daemon's snap package is called feedreader-daemon and it has an app of the same name, you can call it using either of these: /snap/bin/feedreader-daemon or snap run feedreader-daemon That will work regardless of what revision feedreader and feedreader-daemon are. -- Michael Hall

dbus activation running wrong binary

Hello snapcrafter, i need a bit of help when starting a daemon via dbus service within the snap. The app i try to package is feedreader. Feedreader is a GUI RSS reader. When you start `feedreader` it calls a dbus function. Then dbus starts `feedreader-daemon` via it's service file (1). The path

Announcing Snaplint

Hi all, I'm writing to announce a tool I've been working on to encode best practices for snapping software. Inspired by utilities like lintian I've decided to name it 'snaplint'. At this point I'd like some wider feedback as I try to make it more useful. Right now you can run snaplint against

Re: Announcing Snaplint

That is great, thanks! I'd love it as an optional step for the snaps we build in launchpad. Or mabye as warnings on the click-reviewers-tool? Sadly I can't put it in travis because snaps don't work on docker. But I will try it in my manual builds. pura vida. -- Snapcraft mailing list

Re: Announcing Snaplint

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:12:58PM -0700, Spencer Parkin wrote: > proprietary. So many times I find something I think is great and I want to > use it but...oh...crap...it's GPL; can't use it. In other words, GPL is a > pain for in-house development, and it's an infectious license that spreads

Re: Cannot install snap apps from store

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:39 PM Manik Taneja wrote: > On Dec 8, 2016, at 8:21 PM, Oliver Ries wrote: > > Hi > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:31 PM, XiaoGuo Liu > wrote: > > Hi, > > I do not know how many of you have

Re: Cannot install snap apps from store

> On Dec 8, 2016, at 11:13 PM, Michael Nelson > wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:39 PM Manik Taneja >> wrote: >>> On Dec 8, 2016, at 8:21 PM, Oliver Ries wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at

Re: Cannot install snap apps from store

> On Dec 8, 2016, at 8:21 PM, Oliver Ries wrote: > > Hi > >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:31 PM, XiaoGuo Liu >> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I do not know how many of you have met the issue. When I try to install an >> app from the store, it comes

Cannot install snap apps from store

Hi, I do not know how many of you have met the issue. When I try to install an app from the store, it comes me an error like: liuxg@ubuntu:~$ sudo snap install tensorflow-demo --devmode --beta error: cannot install "tensorflow-demo": Get

Re: Announcing Snaplint

Uh...but if I use your tool, then I can't claim ignorance when I'm getting sued for copyright violations. Seriously, though, I hate all the legal crap licensing causes in the development world. Your tool could make life a lot easier in that regard, which is nice. BTW, the GPL is the worst

Re: Cannot install snap apps from store

Hi On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:31 PM, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: > Hi, > > I do not know how many of you have met the issue. When I try to install an > app from the store, it comes me an error like: > > liuxg@ubuntu:~$ sudo snap install tensorflow-demo --devmode --beta > error:

Re: Announcing Snaplint

That would make for an interesting dogfooding run since the tool itself is GPL-3 :-) ~S On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 07:42:36PM -0700, Spencer wrote: > Uh...but if I use your tool, then I can't claim ignorance when I'm getting > sued for copyright violations. > > Seriously, though, I hate all the

Re: Announcing Snaplint

Ha! :) Yeah, I guess it would, though I have no idea what dogfooding run means. GPL purports to be free, but it's not. If a piece of software was free, you could encorporate it into your own software that you need to be proprietary. So many times I find something I think is great and I want