[NEWS] Ubuntu built with Qt

Hi, nice news about the synergy between Qt and Ubuntu: https://www.qt.io/case-built-with-qt-ubuntu-open-source-software-platform/ Many considers Qt only as the UI development framework but in fact Qt's IoT offering is very strong. Since the 5.7 version their main focus is to offer toolkit

Re: Should Syncloud migrate to snappy?

Hi Boris, Syncloud is an exciting project, and it sounds like there's a lot of benefit you can derive from snaps. I'll try and give you some high-level answers to your questions here to point you in the right direction, others can give you more detail from there. > 1. Can we continue to regular

Re: Ubuntu Core 16 Final!

Congrats team! Well done! Jeff On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Michael Vogt wrote: > Hi, > > The Snappy team is happy to announce the release of Ubuntu Core 16. > > Ubuntu Core is an operating system entirely based on snaps, including > its foundation.

Ubuntu Core 16 Final!

Hi, The Snappy team is happy to announce the release of Ubuntu Core 16. Ubuntu Core is an operating system entirely based on snaps, including its foundation. Applications, kernel, core operating system, and gadget components are all managed as snaps and are installed and refreshed by snapd, the

Re: Missing uboot env variables "snap_kernel" & "snap_core" for building an armhf image

Hi Steve & Ogra, Thanks your explanation, I think the thing of snapd-special files is probably not clear for developers, and maybe we can update the porting guide (https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/snappy/guides/porting/) for the brand new uc16 on it. After all, it's the old-fashioned and can not

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

Regards, Jamie. > On 1 Nov 2016, at 23:43, Sergio Schvezov > wrote: > > > >> El 01/11/16 a las 23:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling escribió: >>> On 27/10/16 22:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 27/10/16 08:37, Didier Roche wrote: I would look at

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

On 01/11/16 22:43, Sergio Schvezov wrote: If this is x86_64, everything is aligned with the world, syscall 92 is chown. A useful tool here can help you out, and luckily there is one, run `snap install snappy-debug` and it will do some nice things to figure out what is going on wth these apparmor

Re: Missing uboot env variables "snap_kernel" & "snap_core" for building an armhf image

Am Donnerstag, den 03.11.2016, 15:40 +0800 schrieb Woodrow Shen: > Hi, > > I'm working on port of roseapple-pi (https://github.com/xapp-le/Snapp > yUbuntuCore), and after building an image via ubuntu-image, the new > uboot.env modified by snapd can't find the snap related > variables 

Re: Missing uboot env variables "snap_kernel" & "snap_core" for building an armhf image

Hi Woodrow, On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:40:39PM +0800, Woodrow Shen wrote: > I'm working on port of roseapple-pi ( > https://github.com/xapp-le/SnappyUbuntuCore), and after building an image > via ubuntu-image, the new uboot.env modified by snapd can't find the snap > related variables

Re: Qt 5.7 cloud part now available

Qt 5.8 was easy enough to add so that's now also available with after: [qt58]. Note that Qt 5.8 is still under active development. The next planned step for these upstream Qt cloud parts would be offering prebuilt binaries to cut down the awful build times. Of course if you're compiling your app