Re: Further ABI-related issues for ldc2 snap on 14.04 ... ?

On 05/03/17 14:10, Sergio Schvezov wrote: I think you have come to a cross roads where you will need to choose to either always use the linker from the core snap and link to things from your snap or provide multiple zlib targets for different versions of glibc (or any other library you want to

Re: kpi dashboard available?

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 at 10:14 Adam Stokes wrote: Is there an available kpi dashboard I can take a look at? I'm interested to see where conjure-up sits in the snap statistics. Hi Adam, Your best bet today is the Stats page on https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/, but

Re: Class confinement for Python snaps

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:02:54PM +, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:14:04 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > I'm converting ubuntu-image from a devmode snap to a classic snap, but I'm > > running into some problems. ubuntu-image is a Python 3 application, and I'm > > using

Re: Class confinement for Python snaps

On Mar 10, 2017, at 04:52 PM, Didier Roche wrote: >Note as well that I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/1670388 >against the snapcraft project a couple of days ago. I think snapcraft should >at least fail the build to warn you about this. Thanks, subscribed! -Barry --

Re: Class confinement for Python snaps

On Mar 10, 2017, at 04:02 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: >Any reaosn you are moving from devmode to classic? The progression should be >classic->devmode->strict A couple of reasons. Probably the most problematic one is that /tmp inside the snap is not the same as /tmp outside the snap, and we have

Re: Class confinement for Python snaps

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:14:04 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I'm converting ubuntu-image from a devmode snap to a classic snap, but I'm > running into some problems. ubuntu-image is a Python 3 application, and I'm > using snapcraft 2.27.1+17.4 on Zesty. Any reaosn you are moving from devmode to

Re: Class confinement for Python snaps

Le 10/03/2017 à 16:14, Barry Warsaw a écrit : I'm converting ubuntu-image from a devmode snap to a classic snap, but I'm running into some problems. ubuntu-image is a Python 3 application, and I'm using snapcraft 2.27.1+17.4 on Zesty. The first problem I'm having is I think directly related to

Class confinement for Python snaps

I'm converting ubuntu-image from a devmode snap to a classic snap, but I'm running into some problems. ubuntu-image is a Python 3 application, and I'm using snapcraft 2.27.1+17.4 on Zesty. The first problem I'm having is I think directly related to LP: #1670749. I ended up reopening this

Re: Request for help / ideas to debug issue

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:22 AM, John Lenton wrote: > Hello! > > We're seeing a weird issue with either go, pthreads, or the kernel. If > you're knowledgeable about one or more of those things, could you take > a look? Thank you. > > The issue manifests as nasty

Re: workaround for connect no autoconnect interfaces without login on system

Hi Jamie On 03/10/2017 07:20 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: Gadget developers are supposed to have a voice in what is autoconnected on their devices and it seems that Nicolino is asking for advice on how to make that happen. This comes up from time to time so once there is a definitive answer,

Re: workaround for connect no autoconnect interfaces without login on system

On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 13:41 -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 15:05 +, Nicolino Curalli wrote: > > > > Hi kyleN > > thanks so much for the answer. > > > > A question for go ahead from my side: > > how can I request the store to add an auto connection statement to the > >

Re: workaround for connect no autoconnect interfaces without login on system

Resending since this (and a few other emails) got caught up in a filter that was recently activated for this list. On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 08:36 -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 09:19 -0500, knitzsche wrote: > > > > I don't think the prepare-device script can be used to auto

Re: Request for help / ideas to debug issue

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:22:45 +, John Lenton wrote: > Hello! > > We're seeing a weird issue with either go, pthreads, or the kernel. If > you're knowledgeable about one or more of those things, could you take > a look? Thank you. > > The issue manifests as nasty warnings from the "snap run"

Request for help / ideas to debug issue

Hello! We're seeing a weird issue with either go, pthreads, or the kernel. If you're knowledgeable about one or more of those things, could you take a look? Thank you. The issue manifests as nasty warnings from the "snap run" command, which is also the first step into a snapped app or service.