Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-11-17 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 14/11/16 10:27, Didier Roche wrote: I guess for now, the compiler part (and access to system libraries) should be part of an interface. I'm CCing Jamie to see if he has any thoughts on that. Yes, that makes sense -- probably two different interfaces ... ? I know that access to system

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-11-14 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
> Wiadomość napisana przez Joseph Rushton Wakeling > w dniu 01.11.2016, o godz. 22:31: > > On 27/10/16 22:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: >> On 27/10/16 08:37, Didier Roche wrote: >>> I would look at /var/log/syslogs. Apparmor and seccomp denials are >>> listed

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-11-13 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 03/11/16 12:08, Jamie Bennett wrote: Regards, Jamie. ... I guess an email got lost there? :-) Thanks in any case for taking the time to look at my questions. -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-11-03 Thread Jamie Bennett
Regards, Jamie. > On 1 Nov 2016, at 23:43, Sergio Schvezov > wrote: > > > >> El 01/11/16 a las 23:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling escribió: >>> On 27/10/16 22:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 27/10/16 08:37, Didier Roche wrote: I would look at

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-11-03 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 01/11/16 22:43, Sergio Schvezov wrote: If this is x86_64, everything is aligned with the world, syscall 92 is chown. A useful tool here can help you out, and luckily there is one, run `snap install snappy-debug` and it will do some nice things to figure out what is going on wth these apparmor

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-11-01 Thread Sergio Schvezov
El 01/11/16 a las 23:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling escribió: On 27/10/16 22:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 27/10/16 08:37, Didier Roche wrote: I would look at /var/log/syslogs. Apparmor and seccomp denials are listed there. Note that if you didn't already, you should really start

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-11-01 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 27/10/16 22:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 27/10/16 08:37, Didier Roche wrote: I would look at /var/log/syslogs. Apparmor and seccomp denials are listed there. Note that if you didn't already, you should really start developping your snap in devmode. That way, it will get confinment

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-31 Thread Sergio Schvezov
El 31 oct. 2016 6:25 PM, "Kyle Fazzari" escribió: > > > > On 10/29/2016 08:14 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > > On 27/10/16 10:27, Didier Roche wrote: > >> Just a note: after a quick double checking , the snapcraft go plugin > >> relies on ubuntu packages (I think

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-31 Thread Kyle Fazzari
On 10/29/2016 08:14 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 27/10/16 10:27, Didier Roche wrote: >> Just a note: after a quick double checking , the snapcraft go plugin >> relies on ubuntu packages (I think it should rather download latest >> stable go and use GOROOT to use it). This isn't the

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-29 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 27/10/16 10:27, Didier Roche wrote: Just a note: after a quick double checking , the snapcraft go plugin relies on ubuntu packages (I think it should rather download latest stable go and use GOROOT to use it). This isn't the case for other plugins like nodejs which was the one I had in mind

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-29 Thread Sergio Schvezov
El 27/10/16 a las 17:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling escribió: On 27/10/16 08:37, Didier Roche wrote: It would be great to have D support! Thanks for working on that :) Great to hear :-) Just to be clear, it's already in principle possible to package D applications as snaps; DUB support isn't

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-27 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 27/10/16 08:37, Didier Roche wrote: It would be great to have D support! Thanks for working on that :) Great to hear :-) Just to be clear, it's already in principle possible to package D applications as snaps; DUB support isn't needed, but is very helpful, because a lot of D projects do

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-27 Thread Didier Roche
Le 27/10/2016 à 08:37, Didier Roche a écrit : > Le 27/10/2016 à 01:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling a écrit : >> Hello folks, > Hey Joseph, > > It would be great to have D support! Thanks for working on that :) > I'm going to try to answer to some of your questions, but I'm sure > Sergio (CCed) would

Re: Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-27 Thread Didier Roche
Le 27/10/2016 à 01:13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling a écrit : > Hello folks, Hey Joseph, It would be great to have D support! Thanks for working on that :) I'm going to try to answer to some of your questions, but I'm sure Sergio (CCed) would be able to give deeper insights on some parts as being the

Provisional snap for DUB (D language package/build manager)

2016-10-26 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
Hello folks, Following my attempt to create a snap for LDC (LLVM-based compiler for the D programming language), I thought I'd have a go at another D-related project and snap DUB. This is a package/build manager that's popular in the D community, and so having it available as a snap could be