2016-12-08 2:56 GMT+02:00 knitzsche :
> How do consumers (snap devs) know the lib/API versions contained? On touch
> we had the concept of a "framework", whose version implied a set of API
> commitments. Since this puts QT together with other (Ubuntu ) libs,
> what's
Great idea!
How do consumers (snap devs) know the lib/API versions contained? On
touch we had the concept of a "framework", whose version implied a set
of API commitments. Since this puts QT together with other (Ubuntu )
libs, what's the reasonable expectation?
On 11/11/2016 02:46 PM, Timo
Hi Stuart,
I never got "write" working, it always tells me "permission denied".
For your mount issue, I guess you need to create a empty folder locally
called "test-share-target".
Br
Enwei
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Stuart Bishop
wrote:
> On 29 November 2016
On 29 November 2016 at 08:36, Enwei Zhang wrote:
> Thank you Timo.
> I changed from "./bin" to "/bin", then it works.
>
Did you have any luck getting 'write' to work? I'm getting as far as
running my app and it failing with:
cannot mount /snap/prov/x2 at
Hi Enwei,
I think you might be running into bugs, given how in this and other threads
people are bumping into bugs with the content interface.
I haven't tried write, but I did have ubuntu-app-platform using paths at
first and that did work fine, aside from the mounting bug discussed in this
Hello,
Thanks Timo for the good example.
While I tried to write two snaps(server to share paths to client) that use
content interface to share files, I found "write" slot doesn't work.
The code snippet from server side snapcraft.yaml
slots:
test-share:
content: test-content-server
2016-11-11 20:45 GMT+02:00 Marco Trevisan :
> Although it seems I've some troubles since I can't connect the gallery
> properly:
I suspect there may be a snappy bug or a couple involved, I've run
into similar problems myself. I still need to occasionally run for
2016-11-11 15:45 GMT-03:00 Marco Trevisan :
> Il 11/11/2016 15:46, Timo Jyrinki ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I hinted at this earlier but 'ubuntu-app-platform' (name bikeshedded a
>> few times) is now there offering a huge amount of libraries via
>> content interface.
Il 11/11/2016 15:46, Timo Jyrinki ha scritto:
Hi,
I hinted at this earlier but 'ubuntu-app-platform' (name bikeshedded a
few times) is now there offering a huge amount of libraries via
content interface. We're using it for some builds of for example
Calculator, Calendar and other apps, dropping
Hi,
I hinted at this earlier but 'ubuntu-app-platform' (name bikeshedded a
few times) is now there offering a huge amount of libraries via
content interface. We're using it for some builds of for example
Calculator, Calendar and other apps, dropping the size of those from
50+MB to even under 1MB.
10 matches
Mail list logo