This will continue to grow I'm afraid --- though later versions will
deal with the file directly at some point. All of the rules that are
included in the rulebase file are live patterns that have seen recent
activity. The system automatically removes anything below your rule
strength threshold so
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 10:07:59 AM, Jorge wrote:
This will continue to grow I'm afraid --- though later versions will
deal with the file directly at some point. All of the rules that are
included in the rulebase file are live patterns that have seen recent
activity. The system
Is there a way to integrate message sniffer directly with the new Imail
Collaboration Suite. We are currently using it with Imail via declude, but
that may change soon due to this latest Imail fiasco. If we decide to
migrate to the new Collaboration suite I need to know if we can use message
Take a look at Mdaemon from altn.com instead of Imail? Great product, great
support, great attitude. Oh and works very well with le sniffer :)
Matt D
MaxNett Ltd
t.08701 624 898
f.08701 624 889
www.maxnett.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Matt Day wrote:
Take a look at Mdaemon from altn.com instead of Imail? Great product, great
support, great attitude. Oh and works very well with le sniffer :)
I agree. But to answer the original question, I had the notion that ICS
is the same IMail with other bundled software/services and
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11:30:27 AM, Jim wrote:
JM Is there a way to integrate message sniffer directly with the new Imail
JM Collaboration Suite. We are currently using it with Imail via declude, but
JM that may change soon due to this latest Imail fiasco. If we decide to
JM migrate to
Well, to play devil's advocate ...
A poor man's way to run IMail and Message Sniffer without Declude could
certainly be done without a massive re-write. I'm not going to claim that
it would be *reliable* or *flexible* but you could certainly mimic what
Declude does and change one registry key to
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 12:08:07 PM, Andrew wrote:
snip/
CA As for me, I prefer to use Declude Sniffer. A weighted system rocks.
CA Andrew 8)
CA p.s. Now, if SpamAssassin has a way to shell out to call Sniffer ... hm
SA 2.x had a patch to call Sniffer.
We haven't seen one for
Andrew,
You would also need to lock the file so that the queue didn't steal it.
You might be able to just simply rename the Q* file to get the same effect.
Pete's being a good friend of Declude by not suggesting a modification,
but also a good friend of the user to recommend a much better
Does anyone have a little dissertation on how they have this setup.
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log
Parsers.
- Original
Hello Sniffer Folks,
This is the official release of version 2-3.1 which has the
following key features:
* Improved stability and performance under heavy loads - especially
on over-stressed servers or during uncharacteristically heavy peaks.
* Persistent-Server timing enhancements
11 matches
Mail list logo