RE: [sniffer] Bad Rule Alert: 963461 follow up.

2006-04-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks, Pete! For what it's worth, the rule 963461 hit 647 times here, and after putting in the Rule Panic entries, stopping and starting my persistent sniffer, and then re-queuing my messages held with this rule hit, 216 of the messages were still deemed spam and were held by Declude (and maybe M

[sniffer] Bad Rule Alert: 963461 follow up.

2006-04-18 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer Folks, Regarding rule 963461 - the rule was coded for a short sequence of     (3x). It was misinterpreted and/or miscopied as part of obfuscation. The rule was coded at 20060417.1929 E and removed at approximately 20060418.1000 E. There was one additional rule pulled (9

[sniffer] Bad Rule Alert: 963461

2006-04-18 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer Folks, We have a bad rule circulating in some rulebases. The rule has already been discovered and removed. Please create a rule-panic entry for rule id: 963461 just in case you might have a copy of the rule. After your next update (or tomorrow about the same time if it is