Re: [sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-21 Thread Scott Fisher
2 thoughts from me: 1. Right on on the Nigerian scams, possible keeping these rules longer. As I was forwarding out a Nigerian scam to the spam mailbox, I too wondered how long the Nigerian rules were kept in play. I might also add Nigeria's twin sister the International Lottery spam and Stock

Re: [sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-21 Thread Matt
Scott, Regarding my Cyrillic and Chinese filters, I did a review of a full week's held spam, looking for foreign languages and patterns to tag. I found from other research that the primary Chinese characterset, GB2312, contains the Western Latin characterset, and so someone could send an

Re: [sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-21 Thread Scott Fisher
Interesting. Are you searching for 2 character pairs with GB2312? Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/21/04 01:46PM Scott, Regarding my Cyrillic and Chinese filters, I did a review of a full week's held spam, looking for foreign languages and patterns to

Re: [sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-21 Thread Pete McNeil
At 01:42 PM 5/21/2004, you wrote: Pete, Our Hold range has returned to more normal territory on Thursday. Here's the stats from snip/ One of my thoughts regarding minimum rule strengths and grace periods is that all groups aren't necessarily the same. For instance Nigerian scams are low volume

RE: [sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-20 Thread Michiel Prins
Crew, I reposrted this speed issue before, but despite very intensive debugging and testing, we have not found an external cause (meaning: not sniffer) for the following: When I use sniffer without the persisten flag, I get this log:

[sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-19 Thread Matt
Pete, I noted late last night that my rulebase grew by 700 KB over the size of the previous one that was archived on my machine, and also the hits for some of the tests were noticeably lower and I had a definite increase in the number of messages that scored in my Hold range (instead of scoring

Re: [sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-19 Thread Pete McNeil
At 12:57 PM 5/19/2004, you wrote: Pete, I noted late last night that my rulebase grew by 700 KB over the size of the previous one that was archived on my machine, and also the hits for some of the tests were noticeably lower and I had a definite increase in the number of messages that scored in

Re: [sniffer] Possible blip?

2004-05-19 Thread Matt
Pete, I was judging based on the size of our Hold range which scores from 10-24. On Monday that was 1.86% of total traffic, but on Tuesday that was 2.83%. Message volume was hardly different. Other notables were that on Monday, Sniffer hit 77.27% of all E-mail but on Tuesday it hit 74.53%