RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration

2005-02-18 Thread Andy Schmidt
+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 08:06 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration Pete, Matt was specifically referring to envelope reje

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration

2005-02-18 Thread Andy Schmidt
ew Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 08:06 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration Pete, Matt was specifically referring to envelope rejection (as well as other info gathering actions) based on address validation (and any other criteria based on information as

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration

2005-02-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
05 5:06 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration Pete, Matt was specifically referring to envelope rejection (as well as other info gathering actions) based on address validation (and any other criteria based on information as it can be tested, like a local

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] IIS SMTP Integration

2005-02-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Pete, Matt was specifically referring to envelope rejection (as well as other info gathering actions) based on address validation (and any other criteria based on information as it can be tested, like a local blacklist against the sending IP). The idea being that you don't want any more content se