> When you run it without & what happens?
The same thing occurs...99% CPU utilization.
> Did it create a mysnfrname.log file? What is in it?
No, it didn't create a log file. But as soon as I kill the persistent
process, the non-persistent one runs fine and creates the log... and there
are no e
Yes, I'm aware of that :)
but I find its more convinient/elegant that an update is trigerred only
when necessary!
Thanks
Terence
-Original Message-
From: "Bill Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 19:52:09 -0700
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Automatic Updat
Terence,
FYI, XP does
allow for multiple executions during the day…I’ve been using it for
some time. On the schedule tab, you’ll notice an “Advanced”
button; that’s where you set the schedule to run, say, every two hours,
etc.
Hope that’s
helpful.
Bill Ball
Lion Network
Solut
At 06:16 PM 5/22/2004, you wrote:
Running v2.3 in Linux as follows causes Sniffer to consume 99% CPU
indefinitely. Is anybody else seeing this?
./mysnfrname.exe myauthcode persistent &
When you run it without & what happens?
Did it creat a mysnfrname.log file? What is in it?
When the instance is
Running v2.3 in Linux as follows causes Sniffer to consume 99% CPU
indefinitely. Is anybody else seeing this?
./mysnfrname.exe myauthcode persistent &
Bill
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.
