On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 1:07:56 PM, Andrew wrote:
CA Pete, your metaphors are wonderful.
:-)
snip/
CA If I remember correctly, the MaxPollTime was originally much lower. I
CA now use the full 4 seconds, but I don't know how often that's needed. I
CA easily see Declude processes taking
Hello -
I am reviewing your MDLP report at
http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html, and find some
tests that are seemingly quite effective that I'm not familiar with. If
anyone has any informaiton about these tests, please let me know:
- FABEL (is this the same as FABELSOURCES
On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 4:09:31 PM, Jay wrote:
JSHNL Hello -
JSHNL I am reviewing your MDLP report at
JSHNL http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html, and find some
JSHNL tests that are seemingly quite effective that I'm not familiar with. If
JSHNL anyone has any informaiton
Ahh, that makes more sense now. ham is just what does not pass the
spam threshold. In this light, if Sniffer is hyper accurate and
catches more real spam than all others, it will appear less accurate
overall because of the deficienes in the other tests. For some reason,
I was thinking that ham
Jay, here's more web information on the mxrate tests:
http://www.mxrate.com/lookup/dns.htm
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 1:43 PM
To: Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Subject: Re:
