Re[4]: [sniffer] False positive processing
I have responded off list. Let me know (off list) if you got my response just in case it goes missing again. Thanks, _M On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 12:04:29 PM, Darin wrote: DC> Right. 15 from today. Let me know what you find out. The ones from the DC> 10th were replies to FP processing to investigate further and apply white DC> rules. The others were normal FP reports. DC> Thanks, DC> Darin. DC> - Original Message - DC> From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DC> To: "Darin Cox" DC> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:52 AM DC> Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive processing DC> On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 11:37:30 AM, Darin wrote: DC>> Nope. None of them. DC>> I haven't heard back from the replies to a couple of false positives on DC> the DC>> 10th, and we haven't heard anything from our submissions on the 16th (6) DC> and DC>> 17th (2). I don't remember if we've heard anything from those on the DC> 15th DC>> (4). DC> Right now I'm preparing to process FPs. I have a total of 24. 15 from DC> you. I don't show any others pending. When I'm done I'll go back and DC> look at the 10th, 16th, and 17th to see if I received and responded. DC> _M DC> This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and DC> (un)subscription instructions go to DC> http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html DC> This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For DC> information and (un)subscription instructions go to DC> http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive processing
Right. 15 from today. Let me know what you find out. The ones from the 10th were replies to FP processing to investigate further and apply white rules. The others were normal FP reports. Thanks, Darin. - Original Message - From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Darin Cox" Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:52 AM Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive processing On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 11:37:30 AM, Darin wrote: DC> Nope. None of them. DC> I haven't heard back from the replies to a couple of false positives on the DC> 10th, and we haven't heard anything from our submissions on the 16th (6) and DC> 17th (2). I don't remember if we've heard anything from those on the 15th DC> (4). Right now I'm preparing to process FPs. I have a total of 24. 15 from you. I don't show any others pending. When I'm done I'll go back and look at the 10th, 16th, and 17th to see if I received and responded. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive processing
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 11:37:30 AM, Darin wrote: DC> Nope. None of them. DC> I haven't heard back from the replies to a couple of false positives on the DC> 10th, and we haven't heard anything from our submissions on the 16th (6) and DC> 17th (2). I don't remember if we've heard anything from those on the 15th DC> (4). Right now I'm preparing to process FPs. I have a total of 24. 15 from you. I don't show any others pending. When I'm done I'll go back and look at the 10th, 16th, and 17th to see if I received and responded. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re: [sniffer] False positive processing
Nope. None of them. I haven't heard back from the replies to a couple of false positives on the 10th, and we haven't heard anything from our submissions on the 16th (6) and 17th (2). I don't remember if we've heard anything from those on the 15th (4). Darin. - Original Message - From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Darin Cox" Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive processing On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:38:46 AM, Darin wrote: DC> DC> DC> Hi Pete, DC> DC> DC> DC> Are you getting behind on false positive processing? We have DC> gotten a response in a few days, and are still forwarding false DC> positives for an FP report that we asked for a while rule on the 10th. I'm not behind. Did the message get tagged on it's way out of your system? Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re: [sniffer] False positive processing
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:38:46 AM, Darin wrote: DC> DC> DC> Hi Pete, DC> DC> DC> DC> Are you getting behind on false positive processing? We have DC> gotten a response in a few days, and are still forwarding false DC> positives for an FP report that we asked for a while rule on the 10th. I'm not behind. Did the message get tagged on it's way out of your system? Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
[sniffer] False positive processing
Hi Pete, Are you getting behind on false positive processing? We have gotten a response in a few days, and are still forwarding false positives for an FP report that we asked for a while rule on the 10th. Appreciate you looking into it. Darin.
