> The good news is that SNF:Experimental/Abstract has a very
> low false positive rate.
>
> It may be time to alter our philosophy w/ regard to the
> experimental/abstract rules group and recommend that wherever
> practical, messages should probably be held (not deleted)
> based on a hit in th
I was setting a lower weight on the experimental/abstract result codes
due to inconsistent results in the past. However, after a review of
customer spam that was still getting through, I increased the weighting
on those codes to equal our hold weight. Customer is much happier now.
-Jay
-Ori
I concur Pete in that I have been thinking about upping the weight for the
EXP tests. I recently changed ABST from 20 to 25. I attach at 25, hold at 30
and delete at 35.
SNIFFER-TRAVEL 47 20
SNIFFER-INSURANCE 48 20
SNIFFER-AV-PUSH 49 20
SNIFFER-WAREZ
Hello Alberto,
In earlier times we had a philosophy that no single test should trap a
message. The idea was that my combining tests the accuracy of the
filter system would always (qualified) be improved.
The blackhats have become extremely aggressive about burning IPs and
generating image spam an
Hello
I'm getting storms of spam and Sniffer sets them as (Experimental
Abstract)
Can someone explain how have I to treat them?
Many thanks in advance
Alberto
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing l
Hi
I'm having trouble getting SNF to work with Declude's new gateway product.
Pete suggested I find out from you good folks whether or not anybody out
there is using SNF with it successfully?
Thanks in advance.
Rob
iGive.com
PH 847.477.6968
FAX 312-896-9038
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iGi
