[sniffer] SNF Now directly supported in IMGate!

2008-10-09 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer Folks, Message Sniffer is now directly supported in Len Conrad's IMGate. IMGate + SNF allows you to move your spam filtering out in front of your mail server improving scalability, stability, and performance. Here are some links: http://www.imgate.net/?page_id=101

[sniffer] Re: SNF Now directly supported in IMGate!

2008-10-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, Hopefully, you'll be able to convince Alligate and ORF next to use your new DLL API to scan the content during the SMTP connection without needing the command line environment... Best Regards, Andy -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

[sniffer] Re: SNF Now directly supported in IMGate!

2008-10-09 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Andy, Thursday, October 9, 2008, 12:27:53 PM, you wrote: Hi, Hopefully, you'll be able to convince Alligate and ORF next to use your new DLL API to scan the content during the SMTP connection without needing the command line environment... We have approached Alligate and ORF about

[sniffer] ASSP Threshold

2008-10-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Pete, SNF code spam threshold (ASSP_SNF_Threshold) The SNF result code threshold that is considered spam. SNF result codes at this level or above will be considered spam for the purposes of ASSP scoring. The default value of 20 is good in most cases. Are the result codes

[sniffer] Re: ASSP Threshold

2008-10-09 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Andy, Thursday, October 9, 2008, 2:00:49 PM, you wrote: SNF code spam threshold (ASSP_SNF_Threshold) The SNF result code threshold that is considered spam. snip/ If so, I don't think that this can be handled with a greater than type of threshold, since your list from 20 to 63

[sniffer] Re: ASSP Threshold

2008-10-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi: The design of the plugin at the moment is a binary decision-- either the message is spam, or not. I understand - but currently the plugin has a config option that performs a Resultcode = Threshold test. I think it would be more appropriate to have a Resultcode in (n, n, n...) test. It