[sniffer] Bad Rule Event

2010-12-16 Thread Pete McNeil

Hello Sniffer Folks,

We have had a bad rule event.
The bad rules were created near 0830E, and removed by 1030E.
The bad rules were discovered by our IP/Rule conflict instrument 
indicating that most were automatically rejected by Auto-Panic features.
The rules were part of a rule family designed to capture highly 
obfuscated porn subjects.
Unfortunately the extensive abstraction of the rules matched other 
subjects containing similar combinations of characters.

The Rule IDS are in the range 3694383 - 3694428.
We are very sorry for any trouble and have already taken measures to 
prevent this error in future.


Best,

_M

--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com



[sniffer] Re: Bad Rule Event

2010-12-16 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi Pete,

 Hello Sniffer Folks,
 
 We have had a bad rule event.
 The bad rules were created near 0830E, and removed by 1030E.
[...]

Regarding this event A while ago we talked about sniffer installations 
exchanging rule-panic info via the GUBdb sync info as that is happening every 
(few) minute(s) in stead of every few hours.
Any idea when a new version of Sniffer with that feature will be launched?

Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio 

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism 
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo 
netherlands 
t +31-74-255 06 10 / f +31-74-255 06 11 

b.blok...@tio.nl  / www.tio.nl 




[sniffer] Re: Bad Rule Event

2010-12-16 Thread Pete McNeil


  
  
On 12/16/2010 11:07 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:

  
  
  
  Hi Pete,
  
   Hello Sniffer Folks,
   
   We have had a bad rule event.
   The bad rules were created near 0830E, and removed by
  1030E.
  [...]
  
  Regarding this event A while
  ago we talked about sniffer installations exchanging
  rule-panic info via the GUBdb sync info as that is happening
  every (few) minute(s) in stead of every few hours.
  Any idea when a new version of
  Sniffer with that feature will be launched?


Actually -- rule-panics are triggered instantaneously based on local
GBUdb data.

Auto-Panic:
When a relatively new rule conflicts with a known good IP on your
system that rule is made inert until the next rulebase update.



The next full release will include features for near-real-time rule
additions and removals.

We plan to begin releasing interim updates of the SNF engine with
some of these features early next year.

We plan to complete the next full release by Q3.

_M

-- 
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044 
x7010
  

#

This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to

  the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.

This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,

Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.

For More information see http://www.armresearch.com

To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com

To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com

To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com

Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com