Hello Daniel,
If that's true, we still have the instructions on our site for using the command line version w/ MDaemon.
http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.Installation.MDaemon
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
_M
Thursday, August 9, 2007, 9:51:06 AM, you wrote:
Also
Pete
thanks for your prompt reply
I did go to the website you gave me
but I'm not quite sure which version should I go for
is it version 0.53b? (mdaemon plugin)
or the latest 2-3.5??
please advice
many thanks
Jason
What is up with the PDF spams? They are getting thru the filters like
crazy for the past few days...
Thank You,
Chris Bunting
Lancaster Networks
Direct: 717-278-6639
Office: 888-LANCNET x703
3com IP Telephony Expert
Lancaster
Hi all
I would like to know where can I download a working copy of message sniffer for
evaluation purpose?
I'm using Mdaemon 6.8.4
many thanks
Jason
Hello Jason,
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 11:14:54 PM, you wrote:
Hi all
I would like to know where can I download a working copy of message sniffer for evaluation purpose?
I'm using Mdaemon 6.8.4
You can find the current version of MDaemon plugin (0.53) here:
Just got one a short while ago. Look at these headers:
Received: from p4248-ipbfp02matuyama.ehime.ocn.ne.jp [124.96.113.248] by
mail.4cweb.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD-8.22) id A0D001A0; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:41:52 -0400
Received: from [126.147.120.198] by p4248-ipbfp02matuyama.ehime.ocn.ne.jp with
Sorry for cross-posting. I'm not sure whether Declude and/or Sniffer still
rely on the Paged Pool - and whether their usage would be reported under the
Imail QueueMgr.exe or under some other .exes? So I have 3 possible culprits.
The symptom started as a Webmail problem because customers noticed
Hello Andy,
Friday, August 3, 2007, 5:16:32 PM, you wrote:
Sorry for cross-posting. Im not sure whether Declude and/or Sniffer still rely on the Paged Pool and whether their usage would be reported under the Imail QueueMgr.exe or under some other .exes? So I have 3 possible culprits
Not sure what is up but I'm seeing lots of messages getting through
to my primary folder since yesterday. Lots of .pdf
attachments - Just checked and 10/11 were spam messages in my inbox.
Thanks, Greg
CoffeyNet/AllureTech v 307-473-2323
1546 E. Burlington cell
There have been a lot reported today. It started for us about 8:30am.
We use Declude and added a filter to catch messages with subjects starting
with Emailing:, ending with .pdf and having a body containing The
message is ready to be sent with the following file or link. This
combination may
Thank you a lot ... I will investigate.
Regards
Alberto
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: 07 July 2007 19:24
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: After AutoSNF MessageSniffer stops
Hello
twice (two days ago and this night) after an updating with AutoSNF,
MessageSniffer stops working, after this accident I have found many
files in the working directory with extensions .FIN .XXX
Then:
I stop iMail SMTP Service
I stop MXGUARD Service
I stop MessageSniffer Service
I wait
Hello Alberto,
Since you are stopping the message processing services I don't see
this causing any harm - but it does seem like overkill and may simply
help you mask another problem.
A build up of stale job files usually indicates another more serious
problem. Normally, SNF will keep these files
Hello SNF Folks,
We've just seen another very high spike (attached image).
All rulebases appear to be up to date now to handle this content,
however you should be watching for very volumes.
Based on telemetry from systems testing the new SNF alpha we are
seeing an average of 150% of normal spam
Hello Joey,
Simply amazing. I'm sorry we didn't catch that earlier.
Yes, the 137999 rule in question was (it is gone now) a core white
rule to pass through messages with PDF attachments.
We were so focused on making rules that match the spam that nobody saw
or thought to look for the white
Hello Sniffer Folks,
The greeting card malware spam is being pushed right now with amazing
bandwidth!
This is the first 11000+ / hour spike we've seen in quite a while.
Rules are in place for this, but be on the look out in case it hits
you before your update is ready.
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer Folks,
Vertical Wall Of Spam
--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.attachment: 20070629GreetingMalwareStormInProgress.png#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list
What is with all the .pdf attachments in spam? I haven't noticed
this trend previously. Are they infected or what is the scheme?
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list
Yes, we're getting tons of these too.
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Greg Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:20 AM
Subject: [sniffer] .pdf Attachments
What is with all the .pdf
Hello Greg,
Thursday, June 28, 2007, 10:20:04 AM, you wrote:
What is with all the .pdf attachments in spam? I haven't noticed
this trend previously. Are they infected or what is the scheme?
Blackhats are now embedding their randomized image-spam images (pump
dump, for example) into pdfs
Also getting tons of them in past few days
Thank You,
Chris Bunting
Lancaster Networks
Direct: 717-278-6639
Office: 888-LANCNET x703
MS Certified Systems Engineer
IP Telephony Expert
Lancaster Networks
1085 Manheim Pike
Lancaster PA 17601
Pete,
after a day the SNF doesn't work yet ... what else can I try?
I have checked all that possible
With my best regards
Alberto Santoni
---
ASPita Sprl
Grande rue au Bois, 196 - 1030 - Brussels
+32(0)2 217 85 28 office
+32(0)2 735 78 65 fax
Albert:
I remember there was some small trick to this when I did it a year or so
ago. If I remember right there was a change to the MxGuard INI file that
wasn't obvious. I'll take a look in a bit and see if I can get back to you
with something.
Eric
- Original Message -
From:
Alberto:
I haven't finished looking but one note I did make was that the syntax in
MxGuard.INI had changed slightly to include a comma.
[GLOBAL]
Our working file under v1.7: SpamFilterType=NATIVE SNIFFER
Our working file under v3.1: SpamFilterType=NATIVE, SNIFFER
I will continue to look at
Hi Pete,
Thanks for the info. I will keep my eyes peeled for the beta release.
Thanks,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 10:05 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject:
Thank you Eric
I checked my mxguard.ini
I have SpamFilterTypes=Native,Sniffer :(
May be SNF work now but unfortunately no SPAM is arriving this
evening on my server :-)
Alberto
#
This message is sent to you because you are
What platform is the server running? I had problems running Win2003 and the
latest sniffer, had to back up one ver to make it work.
-- Original Message --
From: Alberto Santoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Message Sniffer Community
Hi
I have Win2003
iMail Server 2006.2
MxGuard 3.1
The last version of Message Sniffer
Regard
Alberto Santoni
---
ASPita Sprl
Grande rue au Bois, 196 - 1030 - Brussels
+32(0)2 217 85 28 office
+32(0)2 735 78 65 fax
+32(0)476 53 88 34 mobile
Skype:
Hello
After an update of MxGuard 1.7 - 3.1 the Sniffer doesn't work any more
I have the Sniffer in persistent mode and loaded with Srvany
I found many files I never seen in the Sniffer dir .SRV .FIN .XXX
Which tests can I do to understand the problem ?
Best regards
Alberto Santoni
See this article at the Internet Storm Center:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=3012
Pump and dump scams now in PDF
Published: 2007-06-20,
Last Updated: 2007-06-20 21:33:39 UTC
by Maarten Van Horenbeeck (Version: 1)
Apparently the groups behind what we know as pump and dump spam have
Pete,
I found this morning an instance where suddenly the number of processes
on my system shot from around 50 to as many as 300, and after that
peak, it settled down and rode the 150 level. All of the hung
processes are Sniffer being called by Declude.
I also had about 10 errors waiting
Pete,
I have left all of those processes active for troubleshooting, and they
are still there and definitely Sniffer. Process Explorer even shows
what command line the executable was run with so I was able to do some
digging in the logs for specifics.
I found that Declude was recording
Hello Matt,
Thursday, June 14, 2007, 1:56:19 PM, you wrote:
Pete,
I have left all of those processes active for troubleshooting, and they are still there and definitely Sniffer. Process Explorer even shows what command line the executable was run with so I was able to do some digging
Darrell,
Did you alter your heap size 3rd entry? If so, did you go to 1024 or other. I
found this article by crossing a Declude page, appears to be what I need to go
after.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q142676
-Keith
_
From: Message Sniffer Community on
Keith,
When I looked at this several years ago, this is what I came up with:
Windows allows a total of 48 MB in the heap, and each service
started process uses the third setting in the chain, or 512 KB by
default, and there is about 10 MB that gets used for other things.
Based on
Here's a better page from someone at Microsoft all about the desktop
heap. This one suggests that you can change the limit from 48 MB to a
value as much as 450 MB. You will probably normally not need more than
the total number of processes that Declude can use times the amount of
memory
Matt,
Excellent research. Very well put together. Thanks for the time and the links.
Keith
_
From: Message Sniffer Community on behalf of Matt
Sent: Sun 6/10/2007 6:29 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Error Messages since WeightGate
Here's a better page from
Hello Keith,
If I recall correctly, that error is associated with an undocumented
memory heap in the Win OS. When that heap runs out of space this error
is thrown. It can hit any application at random, however it seems to
pop up more frequently when one program runs another --
For example IMail
Fortunately with Outlook Express we have the Ctrl-W function to initiate the
forwarding process. Then we can just type in the first few characters of the
address and hit Alt-S to send. Not as quick as a single button, but much
quicker than Outlook without this toolbar. Takes me about 4
I recommend SpamSource, if you are an Outlook user. It's a little toolbar
applet that you can configure any recipient of the forwarded spam and it
will include all the original mail headers - just the way Sniffer, Spamcop
etc. like it. All you do is press the button on the toolbar and the message
It is a wonderful tools! Thanks Andy
Nobody pays us for our work of reporting not cached messages.
The Sniffer staff should offer for free to our community this tools ;-)
Alberto
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Andy
Well done Andy, cant wait for some spam to try it out on.
Regards David Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J.P. MCP, MCSE, MCSE + INTERNET, CNE.
www.adsldirect.com.au for ADSL and Internet www.romtech.com.au for PC sales
Office Phone: (+612) 9453 1990
Fax Phone: (+612) 9453 1880
Mobile Phone: +614 18
I've noticed quite a few false positives and started some
research. Many show hits from ORDB. Apparently ordb.org shut down
late in 2006 but it's still in my mxguard config. How can it be
coming up with hits when there is no server to check against? What
blacklists do you recommend that we
Inserting my 2 cents here since that is all that it is worth.
In backing up what Matt said, let me relate a similar example of a problem
that occurred a year and a half ago to a major IT security products vendor:
At about 6:15 AM PT on a week day in the middle of a normal busy week, their
I sent a message earlier to this list but I'm not sure if it went
through. We've been hit by this Appriver issue and it is still going on
as far as I can tell. One of our users, call him [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sent a message to about 70 people. And this message has been bounced 20
or 30,000
For those of us in the dark about this, can someone explain who Appriver is,
and what is has to do with Message Sniffer?
Thank you,
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent:
Hello,
I was informed some time back that I needed to renew my subscription
to Sniffer soon. I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on May 3rd
and never got a response back.
Today is the last day on my subscription. Does anyone have any
suggestions on where to renew, at the best price?
Hello Computer,
Friday, May 18, 2007, 8:34:27 AM, you wrote:
For those of us in the dark about this, can someone explain who Appriver is,
and what is has to do with Message Sniffer?
Message Sniffer started out as an incubator project inside of
MicroNeil Research Corporation. When it was time
Dear Steve,
I have replied to you off-list regarding our discounted renewal services for
Mesage Sniffer.
Thank you,
Michael Stein
Computer House
609 652-5100
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Steve Guluk
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007
Thanks for the replies...
Got it sorted out.
On May 18, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Computer House Support wrote:
Dear Steve,
I have replied to you off-list regarding our discounted renewal
services for Mesage Sniffer.
Thank you,
Michael Stein
Computer House
609 652-5100
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pete - Thanks for the reply, but I guess I don't understand what you're
saying. Some packet loss and rulebase downloads to slow down for a
time don't reflect what happened to me yesterday and apparently not
what happened to one of the other posters either when he said that
Appriver was having
Hello Kevin,
Friday, May 18, 2007, 8:52:47 PM, you wrote:
Pete - Thanks for the reply, but I guess I don't understand what you're
saying. Some packet loss and rulebase downloads to slow down for a
time don't reflect what happened to me yesterday and apparently not
what happened to one of
Maybe I caused the confusion. The problem I had was with my customer using
appriver. Not with my customers using message sniffer. How can something that
happens with rulebase downloads effect your mail server? It shouldn't. I would
expect there's a seperate problem with your mail server
I think what Peter is try to say is that Sort monster is hosted at Appriver
and Appriver had an issue and therefore so did Sort monster.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=sortmonster.com
Regards David Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J.P. MCP, MCSE, MCSE + INTERNET, CNE.
Hello Chuck,
Yes. We're working on a networking problem at the moment.
I'll keep the list posted as new data becomes available.
Thanks,
_M
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 2:10:40 PM, you wrote:
Speeds are really slow and the connection is lost before
completionEverything checks out good on our
My last upload averaged a lame 6 KB/s.
My last download varied widely in the speed obtained:
0K .. .. .. .. .. 17.85
KB/s
50K .. .. .. .. ..9.58
KB/s
100K .. .. .. ..
Appriver, who is somehow involved with Sniffer, is having a ridicolous
problem with sending messages over and over again (once every few
seconds). They pulled their contact information from their site but
didn't take down their servers. I suspect this is putting strain on
them and if Sniffer
Matt, I see their contact info there, where are you saying they removed
it??
Thank You,
Chris Bunting
Lancaster Networks
Direct: 717-278-6639
Office: 888-LANCNET x703
MS Certified Systems Engineer
IP Telephony Expert
Lancaster Networks
1085
Hello Chris,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 2:30:13 PM, you wrote:
Oh god, that would explain why I put in a support request with appriver
and it bounced back. One of our clients exchange servers was down today
and they queue mail until it is back up, but I'm trying to get someone
to release it
Thanks Pete. I just called them and got someone to tell me the same but no
eta.
Thank You,
Chris Bunting
Lancaster Networks
717-278-6639
Sent by my BlackBerry wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:48:35
To:Message
Pete McNeil wrote:
I'm not sure what the actual issue is (I will get that data later),
however I've just been informed that it should be resolved in the next
20 minutes or so.
The issue was that they were redelivering messages over and over again.
One customer got one message over 500
Thanks for the update, Pete.
Over on the Declude JunkMail support mailing list, it's like déjà vu all over
again.
Andrew 8)
p.s. For the many of us here that don't subscribe to that list... The small
number of recently active messages have been re-queued to the list several
times.
Today's outage was horrible for one of my customers who was waiting on
important emails regarding a property closing today they were buying, it it
fouled all sorts of things up. I guess in some ways appriver's hosted solution
is nice if YOUR server goes down, but if THEIR servers go down, its
Hello David,
Monday, May 14, 2007, 2:59:16 AM, you wrote:
Do not send spam to the sniffer@ list.
Submit un-captured spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or preferably to a
spam collection pop3 box on your system that can be picked up by our
bots.
Thanks!
_M
Pete:
It appears that you guys have it corraled for now. The rate of leakage has
dropped again.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 3:51
Yes I agree also here we are having a real storm !!!
Alberto
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Chuck Schick
Sent: 14 May 2007 16:46
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Spam
Pete:
It appears that you guys
We are seeing the same thing. Started about a week and a half ago.
Rick Hogue
502-649-3431 Cell
Is your association working on the web?
http://www.samprogram.com
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chuck Schick
Sent: Sunday, May
Hello Chuck,
We are working on a sequence of very aggressive campaigns that started
today. They started about 8 hours ago and haven't stopped. We are
catching up though.
Looks like the blackhats decided to start the week early.
_M
Sunday, May 13, 2007, 1:05:45 PM, you wrote:
We are seeing a
Hello Rick,
About that time they started serveral new campaigns using what appears
to be a new version of message obfuscating bot software along with
several new sources for stuffing. Volumes and leakage have been up
since then.
Today's activity is a new, much stronger burst of the same activity
Has anybody notices any new spam storms out there? Since yesterday,
about 10 times the normal spam get's through (normally 2-3 messages a
day, now it's like 2-3 messages per hour). Sniffer returns 0 (clean)
for all of them, while they don't even get a high enough score with
SpamAssasin
Hello Jorge,
Tuesday, May 8, 2007, 1:30:24 PM, you wrote:
Has anybody notices any new spam storms out there? Since yesterday, about 10 times the normal spam get's through (normally 2-3 messages a day, now it's like 2-3 messages per hour). Sniffer returns 0 (clean) for all of them,
I think it's something else. Most message are different in content,
and are not 100% spam. I guess your POP bot has been retrieving them
from my system (I've reported them all).
There is an aggressive new image spam campaign that started about
30 hours ago. This one has a continuously
My secondary is catching most but I'm seeing quite a few sliding
though Sniffer.
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
I've been seeing lots of spam overall for the past few weeks. Filters
are definitely not working as they used to. All of my customers are
commenting about it also
Thank You,
Chris Bunting
Lancaster Networks
Direct: 717-278-6639
Office: 888-LANCNET x703
MS Certified Systems Engineer
IP
Hi;
I am getting the following error quite often recently..
04/21/2007 18:40:58.911 q91c80097df74.smd Cumulative action(s) on this
email = IGNORE LOG WARN [LAST ACTION=WARN]
04/21/2007 18:40:44.849 q91be00d9df71.smd ERROR: External program
[SNIFFER] didn't finish quick enough;
Sorry the last email was sent early..
I also see a lot of files in the Sniffer directory with .que extension.
I have deleted the old ones but there is about 1700 of them still in the
directory that are for today..
Kami
Hi Bonno
tin.it is one of Italians largest ISP's and the (not new) problem is that
many blacklists does catch a RELATIVE high number of spam messages COMPARED
to the number of legit messages simply because the traps measuring this
traffic are located elsewhere then Italy or Europe.
There are
Hello Bonno,
Thursday, April 19, 2007, 7:01:47 AM, you wrote:
Hi,
I just posted this in the Declude.Junkmail list:
snip/
Pete,
Is this something the new Sniffer can help us with, identifying legit mailservers? Will hits have a separate exit code we can use to identify
Hello Markus,
Thursday, April 19, 2007, 7:55:59 AM, you wrote:
Hi Bonno
tin.it is one of Italians largest ISP's and the (not new) problem is that many blacklists does catch a RELATIVE high number of spam messages COMPARED to the number of legit messages simply because the traps
I'm getting a ton of spam today that is getting thru the filter, and a
lot that is getting caught... anyone else seeing this?
Thank You,
Chris Bunting
Lancaster Networks
Direct: 717-278-6639
Office: 888-LANCNET x703
MS Certified Systems Engineer
IP Telephony Expert
Hello Chris,
We're catching nominal amounts at our spamtrap processors.
The primary spamtrap handler is showing 98% capture.
Is something broken on your end?
Have you forwarded samples to spam@ ?
Any errors in your SNF log?
Rulebase up to date?
_M
Sunday, April 15, 2007, 2:33:26 PM,
The F001 bot will be disabled until further notice.
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
To
I do not think that anyone was asking the F001 bot to be disabled. Are you
doing this for upgrading purposes or because there appeared to be an error with
it? A single false positive as described, in my opinion, is no cause for
alarm. Any time something changes, there is a potential for
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 10:41:19 AM, you wrote:
I do not think that anyone was asking the F001 bot to be disabled. Are you doing this for upgrading purposes or because there appeared to be an error with it? A single false positive as described, in my opinion, is no
I am getting a large number of false positives and not sure
why. Mostly mail from newsletters or lists, such as DMXZone, but I
am also still unable to receive some mail from my own internal users.
I am filtering on a per mailbox right now and I have been sending
spam from my mailbox into its
Hi Phil,
Yes, it seems as if some Sniffer rules, e.g., 1367683, is broadly targeting
Google's IPs.
I've submitted 3 false positive reports since last night, at least two of
them were Google users, one located in the U.S. and the other in the
Netherlands!
Andy
-Original Message-
From:
Hello Andy,
Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 9:36:17 AM, you wrote:
Hi Phil,
Yes, it seems as if some Sniffer rules, e.g., 1367683, is broadly targeting
Google's IPs.
I've submitted 3 false positive reports since last night, at least two of
them were Google users, one located in the U.S. and the
Hi,
Unless I'm mistaken, rule 1370762 was targeting the same address range.
If I may make a suggestion:
Before the spam-trap robots are allowed to block major, well-known and
easily recognizable email providers, how about the robot script pulls a
WHOIS and a Reverse DNS and runs that data
Agreed, however reverse DNS is not a universal solution as things like
RR accounts will come from the same base domain as RR spam zombies, and
you would otherwise have to track down each unique reverse DNS entry.
I would test a connection to the SMTP server instead. Most of these
servers
Hello Andy,
Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 5:15:12 PM, you wrote:
Hi Jonathan:
That's exactly the problem. These particular rules were blocking Google mail
servers - NOT specific content.
To clarify, it was blocking precisely one IP. The F001 bot only tags a
single IP at a time (not ranges, ever),
Hi Pete,
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
The rule was in place from 20070326. The first reported false positives
arrived today
Except that reports from end users lingered in my email since Friday. Not
your fault - but just to better demonstrate the ultimate effect it had.
To be
Pete,
CBL has a proven 99.97% accuracy and on some systems over a 40% hit rate
on traffic, yet their methods are rather simple and easy to implement.
If an IP hits your spamtrap, and it has either no reverse DNS entry or
it has a dynamic reverse DNS entry, it is added, if it doesn't, it
Hello,
I've sent examples of these, every time I get them for several weeks, and they
are still getting through. Is there something about them that is difficult?
Because the body always has the same message. Something about doing email
campaigns for charities.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel
You can set up a rule on your mail server to reject them if they have
blank headers
Thank You,
Chris Bunting
Lancaster Networks
Direct: 717-278-6639
Office: 888-LANCNET x703
MS Certified Systems Engineer
IP Telephony Expert
Lancaster
Hello Daniel,
Thursday, March 29, 2007, 2:41:31 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
I've sent examples of these, every time I get them for several weeks, and they
are still getting through. Is there something about them that is difficult?
Because the body always has the same message. Something about
Pong
Shaun Sturby
Technical Services Manager
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Optrics Engineering | www.Optrics.com
Canada:
6810 - 104 Street, Edmonton, AB, T6H 2L6
TF: 877-463-7638Fax: 780-432-5630
USA:
1740 S 300 West #10, Clearfield, UT, 84015
TF: 877-386-3763Fax:
One good thing about Sniffer is that it works so not much needs to be
said :)
This list is pretty slow due to few problems.
Cordially,
Heimir Eidskrem
i360, Inc.
11152 Westheimer
Suite 147
Houston, TX 77042
Ph: 713-981-4900
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.i360.net
www.i360hosting.com
Houston's
Hello Phillip,
The list is often quite for long stretches. ;-)
_M
Wednesday, March 28, 2007, 1:43:22 PM, you wrote:
Since installing Mail Sniffer I have not gotten anything on this
list. Has it just been slow and there is no traffic or is sniffer
eating up this list as SPAM?
Phil
Thanks guys, guess it works.
I actually have had clients call up saying that mail is broken and
that they only get a few emails a day since installing sniffer. They
used all that spam as an indicator that things were working. :) Nice
not to have to spend hours going through the mail every
Hello Jay,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 1:08:35 AM, you wrote:
What's the status of Assert!? I see this mentioned in your Wiki in
August of 05, but it's coming soon on your web site?
Assert! exists and was in production for a while, but we determined
that it was not complete enough so we shut
801 - 900 of 2919 matches
Mail list logo
