, September 13, 2005 4:45 AM
To: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive
I have your response in my sent folder.
I will send it again..
_M
On Monday, September 12, 2005, 8:37:52 PM, John wrote:
JTL I also have sent some false positives in the last 2 weeks
I also have sent some false positives in the last 2 weeks with no response,
the lastest being at 09/10/05 at 9:49 AM PDT.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:08 AM
I am seeing a lot of these get through
John T
eServices For You
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
getting
run when the weight was close to my HOLD weight).
So now it's back to the server room for me.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:16 AM
To: sniffer
Now does anyone know how much overhead Windows 2000/2003 software RAID 1
on dynamic disks produces over hardware level RAID 1?
I am assuming it would be substantial.
I have never noticed an issue, and I would only assume there would be an
issue in higher end databases or where the CPU was
Bill's update script: This has been working great, with the download size
aprox 1.8MB (rule base file is about 6.25MB) and time to download about 25
seconds. Thanks for the work Bill.
Rule base changes: Thanks to Pete for the hard work, the rule base size has
now changed from about 17MB to about
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:23 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered
rulebase update instructions
Were might the wget and gzip files be?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices
Title: Message
Seems to have worked good so far.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:30 AM
Matt, you think too much.
;)
(From one who needs to implement better
scripts, including a triggered script for Sniffer.)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Title: Message
Joe, I will back up Matts
comments. Declude has/is indeed suffering from less than honest/moral
individuals/companies and they are correct in taking steps to protect their
products and company.
Only the method they are using is being
questioned.
Believe me, those of
ATTENTION ROB OF ZELLMAN PRINTING:
Turn off read receipts.
Fix the problem with your server rejecting replies to the very read receipts
you request.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
I forwarded some yesterday to spam@ and then attached them and sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:56 AM
What you should be doing is forwarding but leaving a copy.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Scott Fosseen
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, still no problems so far so I'll write it up to . earth rays,
solar spots, pick whatever you want.
It seems it was a one time thing.
You must be referring to the RAW law.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing
Well, still no problems so far so I'll write it up to . earth
rays,
solar spots, pick whatever you want.
It seems it was a one time thing.
You must be referring to the RAW law.
RAW? Random Answer Whatchamacallit?
Random
Acts of
Weirdness
The RAW law, Keyboard Virus and the
Matt Matt Matt.
Then everyone would have to make sure
they made the relevant changes on their systems.
As we have seen on the Declude Junkmail list, there will
always be those who set up their systems and then forget about them. Making a
change like that would cause problems.
(Moved to list)
Thanks, got it.
This is my current lines, do I need to add others, or are the rules within
these codes? (I hold at 25 and delete at 35)
Is there a full list of codes on the web site?
SNIFFER-TRAVEL external 04715 0
SNIFFER-INSURANCE external 04815
William
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:17 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Re[6]: [sniffer] Effectiveness (lately)
That's strange, our Exchange server does not strip off any of the Declude
headers.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL
I am new to Sniffer, and have it up and running with the basic line looking
for a nonzero return code.
I would now like to start setting different weights for different return
codes.
Does some one have a example configuration I can use?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For
19 matches
Mail list logo
