on 7/20/05 11:06 AM, John Carter wrote:
> I have seen and understand the various Core
> Rule Group Result Codes, but am not sure how to separate those out for
> evaluation.
In your global.cfg add lines like the sniffer-scams line below
test name - category ---
on 7/20/05 9:44 AM, Jonathan Schoemann wrote:
> Question: Do any of you tag subject lines based on Sniffer alone? My main
> problem is that some of my users delete based on the tagged subject line.
I weight each category in Sniffer differently. Some messages are deleted by
Sniffer alone, some m
on 12/21/04 8:21 AM, Pete McNeil wrote:
> The second possibility is that we've skipped the message for some
> safety reason (trying to avoid false positives) though it seems
> unlikely in this case.
>
> Once I see it I will be able to tell more.
Would adding "direct to spam" in the subject make
Pete,
Our subscribers can forward spam they receive to our [EMAIL PROTECTED]
address, which gets forwarded to you guys. Some spammers have been sending
e-mail messages directly to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address (cutting out the
middle men I guess). One spammer, www. c a s i n o b a r .com, has sent
on 12/16/04 5:36 PM, Matt wrote:
> The reason why you aren't seeing these is because you aren't weighting Sniffer
> General at your subject tagging or hold weight, so it takes multiple hits for
> the false positives to show up on your system.
Wow, I didn't realize you knew so much about my system
on 12/15/04 11:41 PM, Matt wrote:
> I've been having a lot of issues with false positives in the General category,
> and I'm in search of a better way to handle such things after making little
> progress without a large time commitment to the issue that this creates.
Wow, I'm not seeing anything
on 11/24/04 12:19 PM, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
> p.s. More favourite acronyms:
>
> RGE (Resume Generating Event)
> TLA (Three Letter Acronym)
PEBKAC (problem exist between keyboard and chair)
Greg
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription inst
on 11/23/04 12:22 PM, Landry William wrote:
> No problems experienced here on either of our servers
I installed it. No problems so far.
Greg
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniff
on 11/23/04 6:08 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Just to let you know. We had a problem after updating to 2.3.2 this morning
> where suddenly a lot of our internal mail got caught as spam by sniffer. Ive
> allready sent a report to the support address. For whatever reason I could
> net send to the fals
on 9/19/04 11:08 AM, Pete McNeil wrote:
> We have quite a few rules for these, however they are constantly
> evolving. Up to now I've been very conservative with the rules that I
> create for these types of messages because they deal directly with the
> text and I want to avoid false positives. Th
on 2/24/04 9:32 AM, Mike VandeBerg wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone else is using F-prot for their virus engine in
> declude, and what they now think about it.
We use F-Prot and AVG on our mail servers. F-prot is usually very good but
they were slow to stop a virus (can't remember which one) a
11 matches
Mail list logo
