Pete posted a link via twitter that there is a bot that is changing
addresses every 20 minutes and sending out large volumes of spam.
I haven't seen it in my own stats yet. J
- Shaun
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Peer-to-Peer
On 2013-04-26 13:12, Peer-to-Peer (Spam-Filter.com) wrote:
Anyone else seeing the same?
The spamtrap pre-filter volume is about 4x typical. It's really quite
something.
The stock-push stuff has a lot to do with it -- since that's become
popular again we've seen striking volumes associated
I'm seeing it, too.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Peer-to-Peer (Support) suppor...@peertopeer.net
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:21 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Volume spike Mon 9AM EST
Just checking to see if anyone else is seeing a
I am getting a lot of complaints from my customers concerning the huge
spikes too.
DustyC
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:51 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re
On 5/10/2010 11:12 AM, NetEase Operations Manager wrote:
I am getting a lot of complaints from my customers concerning the huge
spikes too.
Do you mean huge spikes in leakage?
Hope not-- because we're not seeing that in our instrumentation.
If anything is leaking please be sure to get it
I'm not seeing any spike in inbound connections or accepted message
counts.
Actually, it's lower than Friday's volume and about the same as
Thursday.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Peer-to-Peer (Support)
Sent:
...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Peer-to-Peer (Support)
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 11:12 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Volume spike Mon 9AM EST
Just for clarification: Sniffer is working extremely well. No issues
there.
We're simply seeing a high volume of incoming
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 11:46 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Volume spike Mon 9AM EST
On 5/10/2010 11:12 AM, NetEase Operations Manager wrote:
I am getting a lot of complaints from my customers concerning the huge
spikes too.
Do you mean huge spikes in leakage?
Hope not-- because we're not seeing
On 5/10/2010 12:23 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Pete,
No. Not leakage. Sniffer et al are doing their job well.
Just a large spike in incoming spam volume. It settled down for us by about
11am.
I checked on telemetry and found a mixed bag -- some systems were up
quite a bit-- others were
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 1:15 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Volume spike Mon 9AM EST
On 5/10/2010 12:23 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Pete,
No. Not leakage. Sniffer et al are doing their job well.
Just a large spike in incoming spam volume. It settled down for us
On 5/10/2010 2:15 PM, Michael Cummins wrote:
Sniffer is doing its job well, but I am nearly overwhelmed by the load - to
the point where I might have to turn sniffer off to reduce my processing
footprint. I've already commented out INVURIBL.
My customers don't like lag at all.
That being
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 1:15 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Volume spike Mon 9AM EST
On 5/10/2010 12:23 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Pete,
No. Not leakage. Sniffer et al are doing their job well.
Just a large spike in incoming spam volume. It settled
On 5/10/2010 2:37 PM, Michael Cummins wrote:
Is there a way we could get a SNIFFER feature like that implemented as an
internal DECLUDE test?
SNFIPREP and SNFIP tests give you some direct access to GBUdb -- of
course at that point you've already accepted the message for scanning
even if
Are there many folks on the list who would/could use an IP list
generating function in the SNF engine?
If so what might that look like -- that is, how would you like to tune
it and what special features might it have to be most useful?
If you do generate it, I'd be happy to sync up with you
On 5/10/2010 3:04 PM, Michael Cummins wrote:
Are there many folks on the list who would/could use an IP list
generating function in the SNF engine?
If so what might that look like -- that is, how would you like to tune
it and what special features might it have to be most useful?
If you
15 matches
Mail list logo
