t: Re: [sniffer] MDLP Tests
On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 4:09:31 PM, Jay wrote:
JSHNL> Hello -
JSHNL> I am reviewing your MDLP report at
JSHNL> http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html, and find
JSHNL> some tests that are seemingly quite effective that I'm not
JSH
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 4:43 PM
To: Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Subject: Re: [sniffer] MDLP Tests
On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 4:09:31 PM, Jay wrote:
JSHNL> Hello -
JSHNL> I am reviewing your MDLP report at
JSHNL> http://
On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 4:09:31 PM, Jay wrote:
JSHNL> Hello -
JSHNL> I am reviewing your MDLP report at
JSHNL> http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html, and find some
JSHNL> tests that are seemingly quite effective that I'm not familiar with. If
JSHNL> anyone has any informai
>>Also, perhaps I am misunderstanding the data, but SNIFFER has a SQ of
>>.802 - isn't that relatively "bad" ?
Most people do not have single tests that mark the message as spam. Sniffer
has the tendancy to hit on messages where others tests do not. So for
example on my system Sniffer may hit an
