ement
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Michiel Prins
Sent: donderdag 8 april 2004 21:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
Preliminary tests show there's
no I/O problem but I'll do some addition
Behalf Of Michiel
PrinsSent: donderdag 8 april 2004 21:11To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
Preliminary tests show there's no I/O problem but I'll do some
additional benchmarking here and get back to you on
this.
Groet
At 05:42 AM 4/8/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote:
> http://www.keyconn.net/misc/sniffer.htm
>
> I'll bet you are using b1 - this first 2-3beta does not implement the
>command interface.
Yes, I had b1 in use, trying b2 now.
--
Kirk Mitchell-General Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keystone Connect
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeilSent: woensdag 7 april 2004 17:38To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail/NT4 test
platform (severely underpowered)...snf2beta 2004
At 12:03 PM 4/8/2004, you wrote:
Final Beta looking good here.
But followed instructions (used FireDaemon to handle as a service) and
everything "seems" ok. Nothing strange in logs. The only readily apparent
difference is in the sniffer log, where the 4th column of data, which is
usually a numb
Final Beta looking good here.
Imail 8.1 HF1
Haven't invested any time to confirm that persistence is working, or that it
helps. Haven't invested any time to learn how to read the sniffer logs
either (since everything is working like a charm).
But followed instructions (used FireDaemon to handle
At 05:42 AM 4/8/2004, you wrote:
AHere's a screen shot of what should happen. Behind the scenes when you
run sniffer stop, a sniffer.stop file is created in the workspace. The
persistent server looks for
Sorry to respond to my own post -
There are a number of type-os in the help message. For exam
At 10:23 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote:
>
>>
>>Tried the above and got an error message. Tried:
>>sniffer.exe xxauthenticationxx stop
>>and it paused a few seconds and returned to command prompt, so I'm guessing
>>that it stopped.
>
>That doesn't sound quite right.
>
>In the distribution ther
At 10:25 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
Since you're up, sorry to ask, where's the beta? Didn't save the e-mail.
Rob
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Betas/
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonst
At 09:39 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
> My findings are that persistent is offering great benefits, havnt tried
an excessively harsh test yet, but i'm about to do that.
Just ran sniffer in both persistent and non-persistent modes with over
1,000 mesages in the overflow and MaxQueProc at 50. This pegs
Since you're up, sorry to ask, where's the beta? Didn't save the e-mail.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b
Tried the above and got an error message. Tried:
sniffer.exe xxauthenticationxx stop
and it paused a few seconds and returned to command prompt, so I'm guessing
that it stopped.
That doesn't sound quite right.
In the distribution there are some .CMD files that show examples of the
commands:
st
This worked great.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
> At 08:36 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
> >What is t
At 09:11 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote:
>
>sniffer.exe stop - will stop the persistent server by sending it a message
>file.
>
>Run 'sniffer.exe stop' at the command line and your persistent instance
>will exit cleanly on it's own. [ replace sniffer.exe with the name of your
>executable of
> My findings are that persistent is offering great benefits, havnt tried an
> excessively harsh test yet, but i'm about to do that.
Just ran sniffer in both persistent and non-persistent modes with over 1,000 mesages
in the overflow and MaxQueProc at 50. This pegs out my CPU between 90% & 100%
>Sniffer is adaptive. You can turn the persistent instance on and off at
>will. Simply stop the service - a reboot is not needed. If the persistent
>instance is turned off then the remaining instances will organize
>themselves in the usual way.
I don't have it running as a service, I started the
At 08:30 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote:
>This doesn't make any sense. I have no good theory for this. I am unable to
>create any scenario where using the persistent engine degrades performance.
>In all of my tests on three separate platforms the persistent engine
>produces a significant imp
At 08:36 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
What is the best and proper way to setup Persistent mode on a windows 2000
computer and run as a service.
Fred
* Make a backup copy of your current executable (just in case).
* Rename the 2-3b2 executable for your license and replace your current
executable.
At th
>>Pre-beta
>>20040304211333 d9bec001201263026.smd 312 0 Match 89089
>20040304211333 d9bec001201263026.smd 312 0 Final 89089
>>Persistant sniffer
>>20040407042039 d819316c90154969c.smd 100032 Match 94972
>>20040407042039 d819316c90154969c.smd 1000
What is the best and proper way to setup Persistent mode on a windows 2000
computer and run as a service.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:30 PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final
Pre-persistant sniffer my times sometimes got high, but never beyond 3
digits. While running the persistant beta, about half of my times are in
the thousands. The machine also seems to be far more prone to bogging down
under a mail load. This is on a P2/800mhz 1g ram machine.
Pre-beta
2004030421
At 05:35 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote:
> Yes... that seems about right. When a persistent server is running the
>rulebase is almost never reloaded. Only two significant things happen
>during the setup time as measured by Sniffer: 1) Loading the rulebase, 2)
>locating a job to process (directo
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
So,
making sure I'm following your analysis: I'm looking at my log file and
I'm seeing lines similar to
snf2beta 20040407020014
D60a4134.SMD
181
20040407041123
D7f6a73760202cc6f.SMD 0
16 Final
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
So,
making
, April 07, 2004 4:36 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
So, making sure I'm following your analysis: I'm looking at my log file
and I'm seeing lines similar to snf2beta 20040407020014 D60a4134.SMD 181 30 Mat
At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
So,
making sure I'm following your analysis: I'm looking at my log file and
I'm seeing lines similar to
snf2beta 20040407020014 D60a4134.SMD
181 30 Match 101576 58 20 38 68
And that 181 figure seems to hold pretty stable. 181 is substantially
lower than the valu
11:38 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail/NT4 test
platform (severely underpowered)...snf2beta 20040407140913
D0b86122.SMD 30 90 Final 75148 63 0 6891 68snf2beta 20040407140913
D0b8614e.SMD 90 140 Fi
twork Security - Internet - E-mail
Software Development - Project Management
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: woensdag 7 april 2004 11:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer]
What do the number after the Final/Clean
indicate.
- Original Message -
From:
Pete McNeil
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:38
AM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2)
for snfrv2r3
Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: woensdag 7 april 2004 11:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
What does the sniffer log show during this time?
_M
At 04:48 AM 4/
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeilSent: woensdag 7 april 2004 11:21To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
What does the sniffer log show during this time?_MAt
04:48 AM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
Pete,Despite
my suggestions with less polling time,
ject /
Wannepad 27 - 1066 HW
- Amsterdam
t.+31(0)20-4082627 - f.+31-(0)20-4082628
------
Consultancy - Installation - Maintenance
Network Security - Internet -
E-mail
Software Development - Project Management
--
Pete,Despite my suggestions
with less polling time, I can't seem to get the persistent version to speed up
my message processing. I've copied part of my custom log file below.
Bold numbers are the amount of ms it takes to execute sniffer
(timed by an external program that executes it). Persi
Hello folks,
I'm posting the final beta for version 2-3.
You can get it at the following location:
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Betas/snfrv2r3b2-dist.zip
This version still spits out some monitoring data - the final production
version will have this removed - but there will be no ot
34 matches
Mail list logo
