Re[10]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-02 Thread Pete McNeil
On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 1:07:56 PM, Andrew wrote: CA Pete, your metaphors are wonderful. :-) snip/ CA If I remember correctly, the MaxPollTime was originally much lower. I CA now use the full 4 seconds, but I don't know how often that's needed. I CA easily see Declude processes taking

Re[2]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-01 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, April 1, 2005, 8:04:27 AM, Keith wrote: KJ I have read forum results that this behavior is the reverse of KJ what should happen, I should get a reduction in CPU. I did this KJ around 11pm last night, usually during peak times this server KJ would stay at 65% load. Is there anything I

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-01 Thread Keith Johnson
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:17 AM To: Keith Johnson Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer On Friday, April 1, 2005, 8:04:27 AM, Keith wrote: KJ I have read forum results that this behavior is the reverse of what KJ should

Re[4]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-01 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, April 1, 2005, 11:44:07 AM, Keith wrote: KJ Pete, KJ Thanks for the reply. KJ Running on an IBM Xseries 225 Dual Xeon 2.4Ghz w/ 1GB RAM - KJ running IBM's ServerRAID 5i in IBM's RAID 10 config (4 73GB 10K drives) KJ - O/S is Windows 2000 Standard Server SP4 KJ

RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-01 Thread Keith Johnson
] Persistent Sniffer On Friday, April 1, 2005, 11:44:07 AM, Keith wrote: KJ Pete, KJ Thanks for the reply. KJ Running on an IBM Xseries 225 Dual Xeon 2.4Ghz w/ 1GB RAM - KJ running IBM's ServerRAID 5i in IBM's RAID 10 config (4 73GB 10K KJ drives) KJ - O/S is Windows 2000 Standard

Re: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-01 Thread Matt
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:16 PM To: Keith Johnson Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer On Friday, April 1, 2005, 11:44:07 AM, Keith wrote: KJ Pete, KJ Thanks for the reply. KJ Running

Re[6]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-01 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, April 1, 2005, 3:37:33 PM, Keith wrote: snip/ KJ pegged the CPU as you stated. We have batted around running BIND KJ for NT/2000 on the local machine, but my fear was overhead of KJ another major process running. I don't have any good stats on how KJ much CPU/Memory BIND on an Imail

RE: Re[8]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-01 Thread Keith Johnson
. Thanks again for taking the time to help out. Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pete McNeil Sent: Fri 4/1/2005 10:18 PM To: Keith Johnson Cc: Subject: Re[8]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

Re[2]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-03-31 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 10:50:36 PM, Keith wrote: KJ Pete, KJThanks for the follow-up. I was monitoring the KJ filename.persistent.stat file that yields stats as messages are KJ processed. Is it normal for it to every now and then flash [File KJ is Empty], thus no stats at all.

[sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-03-30 Thread Keith Johnson
I noticed in the archives about a .cfg file one can configure for use when running Persistent sniffer. How do you download it or obtain it? Thanks for the aid. Keith This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to

Re: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-03-30 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 4:08:35 PM, Keith wrote: KJ I noticed in the archives about a .cfg file one can configure for use KJ when running Persistent sniffer. How do you download it or obtain it? KJ Thanks for the aid. You can find a sample .cfg file in the latest distribution. If you