[sniffer] Re: [sniffer][Fwd: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions]

2006-06-08 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Andrew, Thursday, June 8, 2006, 11:32:47 AM, you wrote: > Ditto. > I advise people to use Insert, Item. Far easier than explaining how to > drag and drop (or tie shoelaces). It might be nice to have a SnagIt of that process to share w/ users. > I've noticed that whether the headers surv

[sniffer] Re: [sniffer][Fwd: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions]

2006-06-08 Thread Matt
Darin, Thunderbird allows you to choose the default forwarding method as either inline or as attachment.  It might actually default to inline, I can't remember, but whenever it does message/rfc822 attachments, it is as a whole unlike some other clients that edit it down to the bare minimum of

[sniffer] Re: [sniffer][Fwd: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions]

2006-06-08 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
TED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:45 AM > To: Message Sniffer Community > Subject: [sniffer] Re: [sniffer][Fwd: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions] > > >Thunderbird and Netscape just takes the full original source and > >attaches it as a message/rfc82

[sniffer] Re: [sniffer][Fwd: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions]

2006-06-08 Thread Darin Cox
>Thunderbird and Netscape just takes the full original source and >attaches it as a message/rfc822 attachment. I forwarded this message >back to the list by just pressing "Forward". Interesting that they include the headers with a simple forward, without specifying forward as attachment. I haven