Thanks for reporting this, Pete!
My numbers were more extreme than Pi-Web's.
That bad rule triggered on 18,023 messages yesterday.
Due to the rest of my spam software, two-thirds were either passed (as
presumed ham) or deleted (as very spammy).
So the one-third that was held, I re-scanned toda
Hi Pete,
Checked all manuelly, 7 of 155 was good.
The new rule database don't match on any of the 7.
All 155 is matched as spam.
Monday, October 15, 2007, 4:43:03 PM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
We have fileret out 169 mails based on this rule.
Most are spam.
That's good to hear.
Thanks!
_M
Hello Pi-Web,
Monday, October 15, 2007, 4:43:03 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Pete,
> We have fileret out 169 mails based on this rule.
> Most are spam.
That's good to hear.
Thanks!
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.
##
Hi Pete,
We have fileret out 169 mails based on this rule.
Most are spam.
I have just collected the latest rulebase - it is from 20.00,
The false positive are still taken as spam.
If you want the 169 please let me know.
--22:37:49-- http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/xx.snf