My connection traffic doubled over the course of two weeks. This
started on about the 9th, and seems to have peaked and leveled off last
week. The increase was mostly due to a new brute force spammer (a.k.a.
dictionary attack), but static spam seems to have also increased by
about 20%. I bel
Hello Andrew,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 1:33:20 PM, you wrote:
> For another organization's graph of spam trends as received by them,
> check out the updated graphs at TQM cubed:
> http://tqmcube.com/tide.php
> Their graph shows a sharp uptick at the end of June 2006.
...and a new upward tr
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:23 AM
> To: Message Sniffer Community
> Subject: [sniffer] Re: Increase in spam
>
> Hello K,
>
> Wednesday, October 18, 2006, 8:52:17 AM, you wrote:
>
> > I've been seein
2006 11:25 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Increase in spam
We've doubled the amount of spam being HELD in the past 7 weeks and spam
leakage has about doubled as well.
--
Best regards,
Davidmailto:[EMAIL
We've doubled the amount of spam being HELD in the past 7 weeks and
spam leakage has about doubled as well.
--
Best regards,
Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
This message is sent to you because you are
nly fluctuations and
moderate growth since then. On weekdays we're now at 80% spam, 95% or
better on weekends.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Message Sniffer Community"
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:23 AM
Subject: [
quot;
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:23 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Increase in spam
Hello K,
Wednesday, October 18, 2006, 8:52:17 AM, you wrote:
> I've been seeing a massive increase in spam over the last 2 days getting
> through with minimal scores. Could this be due to the dr
Hello K,
Wednesday, October 18, 2006, 8:52:17 AM, you wrote:
> I've been seeing a massive increase in spam over the last 2 days getting
> through with minimal scores. Could this be due to the drawback of the
> filter involved with false positives, or something else?
It's hard to pin down, but