Darin Cox wrote:
We had a lot... 534 hits between 3:26 and 4:41pm ET, which is when we
added the rule panic. It appears the rule was added in a rulebase
that was automatically updated at 3:26pm ET.
Pete? Status?
Here is a preliminary report on the bad rule:
The rule was coded in error -- t
Darin Cox wrote:
We had a lot... 534 hits between 3:26 and 4:41pm ET, which is when we
added the rule panic. It appears the rule was added in a rulebase
that was automatically updated at 3:26pm ET.
Pete? Status?
The rule is gone. Sortmonsters pulled it while I was out.
I will be covering
: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821
The scores over here for the messages that trigger on rule 2654821 today:
spam that hit the rule: 4
... and were porn: 0
ham that was held by my weight system: 5
ham that was allowed by my weight system: 3
: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821
Neglected to mention it is a Sniffer-Porn rule.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox <mailto:dc...@4cweb.com>
To: Message Sniffer Community <mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 4:47 PM
Subject: [sniffe
] Re: RulePanic on 2654821
Neglected to mention it is a Sniffer-Porn rule.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox <mailto:dc...@4cweb.com>
To: Message <mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com> Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 4:47 PM
Subje
Neglected to mention it is a Sniffer-Porn rule.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 4:47 PM
Subject: [sniffer] RulePanic on 2654821
We had to put a RulePanic on 2654821. We were getting a ton of FPs on it.
Pet
