[sniffer] Re: Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System
Yes. I woke up to boxes full of spam. I have not got in to the system to see what is happening but it looks like my rules are not working. --Original Message-- From: Pete McNeil Sender: Message Sniffer Community To: Message Sniffer Community ReplyTo: Message Sniffer Community Sent: Jul 12, 2008 3:33 AM Subject: [sniffer] Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System Hello Sniffer Folks, Early this morning we completed significant upgrades to our rulebase delivery system yielding a 10 fold increase in available bandwidth and a 5 fold increase in delivery transaction rates. Please let us know if you observe any negative or positive effects. From observations and theory rulebases should be delivered more quickly and more frequently. I will continue to monitor the system closely for any aberrations. Thanks, _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED] NetEase Internet Access Service Parsons, TN 888-463-8327 / 731-845-5640 # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sniffer] Re: Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System
All appears to be working correctly here :-) --PTP -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 4:34 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System Hello Sniffer Folks, Early this morning we completed significant upgrades to our rulebase delivery system yielding a 10 fold increase in available bandwidth and a 5 fold increase in delivery transaction rates. Please let us know if you observe any negative or positive effects. From observations and theory rulebases should be delivered more quickly and more frequently. I will continue to monitor the system closely for any aberrations. Thanks, _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sniffer] Re: Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System - All OK here
Pete: We have a regional based trap running post-Sniffer. When Sniffer hiccups (or we've done something to cause it to hiccup) there are thousands of mails in it over the space of a few hours, almost all spam. There is no increase there overnight so our rulebases are definitely still working as expected. On that note, we ended up having to go to the RC code very early this year because of the increasing high levels of spam getting through the last release version. I know this shouldn't have been the case but in that final RC version we were running the leakage was fairly significant, (approximately 40 times what it was in a typical night like last night for example). The rule base updates were working and all mail was getting vetted but some part of the magic you do didn't seem to be working. We waited a week or so following your release notice for 3.0 to install it and found an immediate reduction in spam to the sort of levels you were achieving for us a year or so ago (adjusted a little for the increased level of what's out there today vs. a year ago). All appears to be well here. No reply necessary. Thanks for a great product. - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 1:33 AM Subject: [sniffer] Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System Hello Sniffer Folks, Early this morning we completed significant upgrades to our rulebase delivery system yielding a 10 fold increase in available bandwidth and a 5 fold increase in delivery transaction rates. Please let us know if you observe any negative or positive effects. From observations and theory rulebases should be delivered more quickly and more frequently. I will continue to monitor the system closely for any aberrations. Thanks, _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sniffer] Re: [Fwd: FW: [sniffer] Re: Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System]
Hello Steven, Saturday, July 12, 2008, 11:04:57 AM, you wrote: I am having the same problem. My existing production wget script is not able to download the new .snf file, but I can do it manually with a browser. From my log I see that wget makes the connection to the server, and can see the .snf file, but the connection is closed immediately when the download starts. I'm working on this. I'm not sure what's causing it-- Apparently some option in wget. I have verified that some older scripts don't work. It appears to be related to whether gzip is accepted. _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
