[sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer Folks, A rule was created today by one of the robots which targets .comcast.net -- This happened when a number of blacklists including SBL listed comcast IPs causing the robot to be convinced that a message in the spamtrap warranted tagging the domain. The rule has been

Re: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Computer House Support
Whew! Just got done forwarding 90 false positives to mail clients. Sure glad you caught it! Michael Stein Computer House - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sniffer@sortmonster.com Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:27 AM Subject: [sniffer] Rule 353039

RE: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net Importance: High Hello Sniffer Folks, A rule was created today by one of the robots which targets .comcast.net -- This happened when a number of blacklists including SBL listed comcast IPs causing the robot to be convinced that a message

RE: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Erik
Pete, Is this in the beta/free release of Sniffer rules? Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 6:20 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: RE: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net Thanks

Re: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Matt
Warning! When you add a RulePanic entry and are running Sniffer in persistent mode, you have to restart the service for it to take effect. I changed this earlier and it had no effect until I restarted the service on my box. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but just changing my config file had no

Re: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Computer House Support
Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in place. Any suggestions? Mike Stein This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Re[2]: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 12:31:18 PM, Erik wrote: E Pete, E Is this in the beta/free release of Sniffer rules? It may not be --- it's new enough that it may have been excluded from the demo rulebase. To make sure you should make a quick scan of your SNF log file for that rule number. In any

Re: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Matt
See my message below...restart your Sniffer service and it should work. Matt Computer House Support wrote: Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in place. Any suggestions? Mike Stein This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and

Re[2]: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 12:45:53 PM, Computer wrote: CHS Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in CHS place. Any suggestions? * be sure you have updated rulbase.cfg * be sure your entry is in the correct format. You will find examples at the bottom of your .cfg

Re[2]: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 12:41:42 PM, Matt wrote: M Warning! M When you add a RulePanic entry and are running Sniffer in persistent M mode, you have to restart the service for it to take effect. You can also issue license.exe reload snip/ M Pete, when you send out these notifications, would

Re: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net

2005-05-10 Thread Computer House Support
] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net See my message below...restart your Sniffer service and it should work. Matt Computer House Support wrote: Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in place. Any suggestions? Mike Stein This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer