On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 4:06:47 PM, Jonathan wrote:
JH> How does a user go about modifying the custom sniffer rules? Must Sort
JH> Monster be contacted or is it possible to do this with some other system
JH> (such as a web based interface)?
The "normal" way right now is to work through u
, September 14, 2004 3:28 PM
To: Landry William
Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 1:05:29 PM, Landry wrote:
LW> Pete, I started running the new code this morning, and so far, so
LW> good. I'll let you know if I see anything strange.
quot;penis enlargement", but for our local government agency, it causes
problems.
Corby
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Surprising m
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 1:05:29 PM, Landry wrote:
LW> Pete, I started running the new code this morning, and so far, so good.
LW> I'll let you know if I see anything strange.
Thanks.
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription inst
Pete, I started running the new code this morning, and so far, so good.
I'll let you know if I see anything strange.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:56 AM
To: Agid, Corby
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Surprising m
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 11:48:43 AM, Corby wrote:
AC> I suppose everyone's userbases have differenent
AC> requirements. An ISP or private enterprise might worry about
AC> false postives on "horny teenagers" and "penis enlargement", but
AC> for our local government agency, it causes proble
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 11:41:48 AM, Corby wrote:
AC> To which addresss should I send these?
AC> Also, I mis-stated the spam. They were not plain text, but
AC> html, but clearly have many "classic" spam attributes. I will
AC> send them along, but need to know where.
Please zip them an
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam
To which addresss should I send these?
Also, I mis-stated the spam. They were not plain text, but html, but
clearly have many "classic" spam attributes. I will send the
TECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:25 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [sniffer] Surprising missed
spam
Corby,Personally, I'm a fan of leaving the generic stuff
out due to the potential of false positives. Those of us that ar
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:29 PM
> To: Agid, Corby
> Subject: Re: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam
>
> On Monday, September 13, 2004, 7:22:03 PM, Corby wrote:
>
> AC> Hello,
>
> AC> I was surprised recently by some
Corby,
Personally, I'm a fan of leaving the generic stuff out due to the
potential of false positives. Those of us that are using Sniffer in
addition to other spam blocking mechanisms can afford to lose some
Sniffer hits on such phrases because they will be picked up by other
means almost all
On Monday, September 13, 2004, 7:22:03 PM, Corby wrote:
AC> Hello,
AC> I was surprised recently by some spam that got through
AC> without getting caught by the sniffer. We've been getting some
AC> plain text messages that have obvious spam words in the subject
AC> line. For example, a plain t
Title: Surprising missed spam
Hello,
I was surprised recently by some spam that got through without getting caught by the sniffer. We've been getting some plain text messages that have obvious spam words in the subject line. For example, a plain text message with "horny teenagers" came
13 matches
Mail list logo
