Re[6]: [sniffer] Effectiveness (lately)

2004-07-29 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, July 29, 2004, 1:23:11 PM, John wrote: JTL Would the new attached fall under the same rule? Yes. It looks like the same domain is involved. I've launched a compile of your rulebase - you should be updated very quickly. In this case it seems that you started receiving these a few

RE: Re[6]: [sniffer] Effectiveness (lately)

2004-07-29 Thread Landry William
That's strange, our Exchange server does not strip off any of the Declude headers. Bill -Original Message- From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[6]: [sniffer] Effectiveness (lately) Should I

RE: Re[6]: [sniffer] Effectiveness (lately)

2004-07-29 Thread John Tolmachoff (Lists)
William Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:17 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Re[6]: [sniffer] Effectiveness (lately) That's strange, our Exchange server does not strip off any of the Declude headers. Bill -Original Message- From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL